Fredrick Lynwood Foley v. Lieutenant Cook, Fredrick Lynwood Foley v. Larry Huffman L.M. Saunders

Fourth Circuit

Fredrick Lynwood Foley v. Lieutenant Cook, Fredrick Lynwood Foley v. Larry Huffman L.M. Saunders

74 F.3d 1231, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 38832

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 17, 1996·No. 95-7429·Published

Opinion

74 F.3d 1231
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Fredrick Lynwood FOLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Lieutenant COOK, Defendant-Appellee.
Fredrick Lynwood FOLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Larry HUFFMAN; L.M. Saunders, Defendants-Appellees.

Nos. 95-7429, 95-7460.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 14, 1995.
Decided Jan. 17, 1996.

Fredrick Lynwood Foley, Appellant Pro Se.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaints. We have reviewed the records and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Foley v. Cook, No. CA-95-984-R; Foley v. Huffman, No. CA-95-1013-R (W.D.Va. Sept. 5, 1995; Sept. 13, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

74 F.3d 1231
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Fredrick Lynwood FOLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Lieutenant COOK, Defendant-Appellee.
Fredrick Lynwood FOLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Larry HUFFMAN; L.M. Saunders, Defendants-Appellees.

Nos. 95-7429, 95-7460.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 14, 1995.
Decided Jan. 17, 1996.

Fredrick Lynwood Foley, Appellant Pro Se.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaints. We have reviewed the records and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Foley v. Cook, No. CA-95-984-R; Foley v. Huffman, No. CA-95-1013-R (W.D.Va. Sept. 5, 1995; Sept. 13, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Fredrick Lynwood Foley v. Lieutenant Cook, Fredrick Lynwood Foley v. Larry Huffman L.M. Saunders, 74 F.3d 1231, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 38832 (4th Cir. 1996).

Pincite

74 F.3d 1231 (Fredrick Lynwood Foley v. Lieutenant Cook, Fredrick Lynwood Foley v. Larry Huffman L.M. Saunders) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.