Fredrick Lynwood Foley v. F.S. Taylor, III P. Lightner R.W. Byrd Major Day R.F. Keeler, Doctor, Fredrick Lynwood Foley v. Captain Boyers J. Mueller

74 F.3d 1231, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 38836
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 17, 1996
Docket95-7287
StatusPublished

This text of 74 F.3d 1231 (Fredrick Lynwood Foley v. F.S. Taylor, III P. Lightner R.W. Byrd Major Day R.F. Keeler, Doctor, Fredrick Lynwood Foley v. Captain Boyers J. Mueller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fredrick Lynwood Foley v. F.S. Taylor, III P. Lightner R.W. Byrd Major Day R.F. Keeler, Doctor, Fredrick Lynwood Foley v. Captain Boyers J. Mueller, 74 F.3d 1231, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 38836 (4th Cir. 1996).

Opinion

74 F.3d 1231
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Fredrick Lynwood FOLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
F.S. TAYLOR, III; P. Lightner; R.W. Byrd; Major Day;
R.F. Keeler, Doctor, Defendants-Appellees.
Fredrick Lynwood FOLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Captain BOYERS; J. Mueller, Defendants-Appellees.

Nos. 95-7287, 95-7301.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: December 14, 1995.
Decided: January 17, 1996.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk and Samuel G. Wilson, District Judges. (CA-95-873-R, CA-95-249-R)

Fredrick Lynwood Foley, Appellant Pro Se. Lance Bradford Leggitt, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, VA, for Appellees.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaints. We have reviewed the records and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Foley v. Taylor, No. CA-95-873-R; Foley v. Boyers, No. CA-95-249-R (W.D.Va. Aug. 21, 1995; Aug. 9, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
74 F.3d 1231, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 38836, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fredrick-lynwood-foley-v-fs-taylor-iii-p-lightner--ca4-1996.