Fredrick Clark v. the State of Florida
This text of Fredrick Clark v. the State of Florida (Fredrick Clark v. the State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed February 19, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D23-1964 Lower Tribunal No. F15-24199 ________________
Fredrick Clark, Appellant,
vs.
The State of Florida, Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Ariel Rodriguez, Judge.
Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Susan S. Lerner, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General and Daniel Colmenares, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before SCALES, GORDO and BOKOR, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Roundtree v. State, 955 So. 2d 1184, 1186 (Fla. 3d
DCA 2007) (“For a trial court to revoke probation based on a violation of a
condition of probation, the State must prove by a preponderance of the
evidence that the defendant willfully and substantially violated that
condition.”); Smith v. State, 329 So. 3d 256, 257 (Fla. 1st DCA 2021)
(holding that on review of an order revoking probation, the appellate court
first examines whether competent substantial evidence supports the trial
court’s finding of a willful and substantial violation).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Fredrick Clark v. the State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fredrick-clark-v-the-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2025.