Fredric Eugene Preston v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 11, 2012·No. A12D0437·Published

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,_________________ July 11, 2012

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A12D0437. FREDRIC EUGENE PRESTON v. THE STATE.

Fredric Preston filed a motion to correct clerical error, in which he sought credit for time served. The trial court denied the motion on November 23, 2011, and Preston seeks discretionary review of the trial court’s order. We lack jurisdiction. The trial court’s order denying Preston’s motion to correct a clerical error is directly appealable. See Cochran v. State, Case No. A11A1601 (decided January 31, 2012). Ordinarily, if a party applies for discretionary review of a directly appealable order, we grant the application under OCGA § 5-6-35 (j). To fall within this general rule, however, the application must be filed within 30 days of entry of the order to be appealed. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (d) & (j); Hill v. State, 204 Ga. App. 582 (420 SE2d 393) (1992). The trial court’s order was entered on November 23, 2011, but Preston did not file this application until 210 days later, on June 20, 2012. Accordingly, his untimely application is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 07/11/2012 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,_________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fredric Eugene Preston v. State, (Ga. Ct. App. 2012).

Fredric Eugene Preston v. State (Fredric Eugene Preston v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hill v. State
420 S.E.2d 393 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1992)