Fredric Eichelman v. Dr. Albert H. Reed

Sixth Circuit

Fredric Eichelman v. Dr. Albert H. Reed

272 F.2d 397

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedOctober 16, 1959

Docket13797

StatusPublished

This text of 272 F.2d 397 (Fredric Eichelman v. Dr. Albert H. Reed) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fredric Eichelman v. Dr. Albert H. Reed, 272 F.2d 397 (6th Cir. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The above cause coming on to be heard upon the transcripts, the briefs of the parties and the arguments of counsel in open court, and the court being duly advised,

Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the District Court be and is hereby affirmed; and that the order dismissing appellant’s complaint and denial of motion for a new trial be and are hereby affirmed on the opinion of Judge Connell.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The above cause coming on to be heard upon the transcripts, the briefs of the parties and the arguments of counsel in open court, and the court being duly advised,

Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the District Court be and is hereby affirmed; and that the order dismissing appellant’s complaint and denial of motion for a new trial be and are hereby affirmed on the opinion of Judge Connell.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

272 F.2d 397, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fredric-eichelman-v-dr-albert-h-reed-ca6-1959.