Fredric Eichelman v. Dr. Albert H. Reed

Sixth Circuit

Fredric Eichelman v. Dr. Albert H. Reed

272 F.2d 397

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided October 16, 1959·No. 13797·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The above cause coming on to be heard upon the transcripts, the briefs of the parties and the arguments of counsel in open court, and the court being duly advised,

Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the District Court be and is hereby affirmed; and that the order dismissing appellant’s complaint and denial of motion for a new trial be and are hereby affirmed on the opinion of Judge Connell.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The above cause coming on to be heard upon the transcripts, the briefs of the parties and the arguments of counsel in open court, and the court being duly advised,

Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the District Court be and is hereby affirmed; and that the order dismissing appellant’s complaint and denial of motion for a new trial be and are hereby affirmed on the opinion of Judge Connell.

Fredric Eichelman v. Dr. Albert H. Reed, 272 F.2d 397 (6th Cir. 1959).

Pincite

272 F.2d 397 (Fredric Eichelman v. Dr. Albert H. Reed) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.