Fredonia Gas Co. v. Bailey

83 P. 982, 72 Kan. 405, 1905 Kan. LEXIS 362
CourtSupreme Court of Kansas
DecidedDecember 9, 1905
DocketNo. 14,336
StatusPublished

This text of 83 P. 982 (Fredonia Gas Co. v. Bailey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fredonia Gas Co. v. Bailey, 83 P. 982, 72 Kan. 405, 1905 Kan. LEXIS 362 (kan 1905).

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Porter, J.:

This was an action to recover money alleged to' be due for services in drilling certain wells. Plaintiff in error was defendant below. The petition contained two causes of action, one upon a claim for $2652 for drilling three wells on the Muckey farm, and another for $1349 for drilling and cleaning a well on another farm.

The answer set up a general denial and a defense of a settlement, by the terms of which it was averred that defendant had paid a part of the amount agreed upon, leaving a balance of $1000, which defendant admitted was due, and which defendant was ready and willing to pay. Upon the trial plaintiff dismissed the first cause of action, and the trial proceeded upon the second. No amendment or change was made in the answer. Defendant offered proof that the $1000 which was admitted to be due was still on hand and that plaintiff could have it on demand. The jury found for plaintiff in the sum of $1094.60, and in answer to special questions found that no settlement had been made.

[406]*406By its answer and its evidence plaintiff in error admitted that there was $1000 due plaintiff below. This leaves but $94.60 involved here, the difference between the amount of the judgment and the amount over which there is no controversy, and for that reason the motion to dismiss must be allowed. See the following authorites: Jenness v. Citizens’ National Bank of Rome, 110 U. S. 52, 3 Sup. Ct. 425, 28 L. Ed. 67; 2 Cyc. 576; 2 Cent. Dig., c. 928, § 236.

The case is dismissed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jenness v. Citizens' Nat. Bank of Rome
110 U.S. 52 (Supreme Court, 1884)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
83 P. 982, 72 Kan. 405, 1905 Kan. LEXIS 362, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fredonia-gas-co-v-bailey-kan-1905.