Fredericks v. Lederer

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Fredericks v. Lederer

126 Misc. 184, 212 N.Y.S. 614, 1925 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1140

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided December 11, 1925·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The objections to the act of 1896 pointed out in Schnaier v. Navarre Hotel & Importation Co. (182 N. Y. 83) have been removed in the present statute (Greater New York Charter, §§ 415-a, 416-a).

Any employing or master plmnber may now register though he is only to receive a certificate of such registration if he holds a certificate of the examining board. It is the registration of its members, merely, and not the holding of a certificate, that is made a condition precedent to the conduct of business by a copartnership. Judgment affirmed, with twenty-five dollars costs.

All concur; present, Bijur, Levy and Churchill, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The objections to the act of 1896 pointed out in Schnaier v. Navarre Hotel & Importation Co. (182 N. Y. 83) have been removed in the present statute (Greater New York Charter, §§ 415-a, 416-a).

Any employing or master plmnber may now register though he is only to receive a certificate of such registration if he holds a certificate of the examining board. It is the registration of its members, merely, and not the holding of a certificate, that is made a condition precedent to the conduct of business by a copartnership. Judgment affirmed, with twenty-five dollars costs.

All concur; present, Bijur, Levy and Churchill, JJ.

Fredericks v. Lederer, 126 Misc. 184, 212 N.Y.S. 614, 1925 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1140 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

126 Misc. 184 (Fredericks v. Lederer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related