Frederick Weinberg v. Scott E Kaplan LLC

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Frederick Weinberg v. Scott E Kaplan LLC. Read the opinion of the Court — 699 F. App'x 118
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided September 14, 2017·No. 16-4145·Unpublished

Opinion

NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 16-4145

FREDERICK M. WEINBERG; JANICE T. NINI, Appellants

v.

SCOTT E. KAPLAN, LLC

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (District Court No.: 3-16-cv-04913)

ORDER AMENDING OPINION

It has come to the Clerk’s attention that the caption was incorrect on the Court’s Opinion and Judgment entered August 21, 2017, and did not include the second Appellant Janice T. Nini. It is noted that the opinion addressed the claims on behalf of both husband and wife. Accordingly, It is hereby O R D E R E D that the caption on the opinion filed on August 21, 2017 is amended as follows:

FREDERICK M. WEINBERG; JANICE T. NINI, Appellants

v.

SCOTT E. KAPLAN, LLC

In addition, an Amended Judgment and Amended Mandate will be issued.

For the Court,

Marcia M. Waldron, Clerk

Date: September 14, 2017 CJG/cc: Peter A. Ouda, Esq.

William G. Wright, Esq.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Frederick Weinberg v. Scott E Kaplan LLC, (3d Cir. 2017).

Frederick Weinberg v. Scott E Kaplan LLC (Frederick Weinberg v. Scott E Kaplan LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.