Frederick W. Copeland v. First Federal Savings and Loan Association of Lake County

414 F.2d 274
CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit
DecidedNovember 4, 1969
Docket27296_1
StatusPublished

This text of 414 F.2d 274 (Frederick W. Copeland v. First Federal Savings and Loan Association of Lake County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Frederick W. Copeland v. First Federal Savings and Loan Association of Lake County, 414 F.2d 274 (1st Cir. 1969).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

We have concluded on the merits that this case is of such character as not to justify oral argument. Accordingly, we have directed the clerk to place the case on the Summary Calendar and to notify the parties of this fact in writing. See Rule 18 of the Rules of this Court and Murphy v. Houma Well Service, 5 Cir. 1969, 409 F.2d 804.

In his pro se complaint, Frederick W. Copeland seeks to enjoin the execution of a state court’s writ of assistance that ordered him ejected from certain real property in favor of the mortgagee, First Federal Savings and Loan Association of Lake County, a Corporation, et al. He also seems to complain of the procedure by which he was at one time adjudged incompetent. Beyond vague references to the equal protection and due process clauses, the complaint states no bases for federal jurisdiction or any cognizable grounds upon which the relief sought might be granted. The district court properly dismissed the complaint.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
414 F.2d 274, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frederick-w-copeland-v-first-federal-savings-and-loan-association-of-lake-ca1-1969.