Frederick v. United States
This text of 668 F. App'x 521 (Frederick v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Sam Frederick appeals the district court’s order accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to grant the United States summary judgment on Frederick’s malpractice action, brought pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 1346, 2671-2680 (West 2006 & Supp. 2016). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. Frederick v. United States, No. 9:15-cv-02699-MGL, 2016 WL 1317528 (D.S.C. mar. 14, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
668 F. App'x 521, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frederick-v-united-states-ca4-2016.