Frederick v. United States

668 F. App'x 521
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 15, 2016
DocketNo. 16-6638
StatusPublished

This text of 668 F. App'x 521 (Frederick v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Frederick v. United States, 668 F. App'x 521 (4th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Sam Frederick appeals the district court’s order accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to grant the United States summary judgment on Frederick’s malpractice action, brought pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 1346, 2671-2680 (West 2006 & Supp. 2016). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. Frederick v. United States, No. 9:15-cv-02699-MGL, 2016 WL 1317528 (D.S.C. mar. 14, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
668 F. App'x 521, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frederick-v-united-states-ca4-2016.