Frederick v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Frederick v. State

1912 OK CR 318, 123 P. 1134, 7 Okla. Crim. 726, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 173

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided May 8, 1912·No. Nos. A-1373, A-1374.·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, William Frederick, was convicted at the July, 1911, term of the county court of Craig county, on two charges of selling intoxicating liquor, and his punishment in eaeh fixed at a fine of fifty dollars and confinement in the county jail for a period of thirty days. The appeals were filed in this court on September 12, 1911. No briefs have been filed and no appearance made for oral argument. The Attorney General has moved for an affirmation for want of prosecution under rule 4. The motion is sustained, and the judgments of the trial court are affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, William Frederick, was convicted at the July, 1911, term of the county court of Craig county, on two charges of selling intoxicating liquor, and his punishment in eaeh fixed at a fine of fifty dollars and confinement in the county jail for a period of thirty days. The appeals were filed in this court on September 12, 1911. No briefs have been filed and no appearance made for oral argument. The Attorney General has moved for an affirmation for want of prosecution under rule 4. The motion is sustained, and the judgments of the trial court are affirmed.

Frederick v. State, 1912 OK CR 318, 123 P. 1134, 7 Okla. Crim. 726, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 173 (Okla. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

1912 OK CR 318 (Frederick v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.