Frederick v. State

980 So. 2d 1243, 2008 WL 1960258
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Frederick v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 931 So. 2d 967
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 7, 2008·No. 2D06-5072·Published

Opinion

980 So.2d 1243 (2008)

Benjamin Jarod FREDERICK, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 2D06-5072.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 7, 2008.

*1244 James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Judith Ellis, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Susan D. Dunlevy, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

KELLY, Judge.

Benjamin Frederick was convicted of various offenses he committed when fleeing from police officers attempting to conduct a traffic stop. In this appeal, he challenges only his convictions for possession of cocaine and possession of drug paraphernalia.[1] The attorney general acknowledges, and we agree, that the State failed to prove that Frederick either actually or constructively possessed the contraband found in his car during a search of his vehicle. Accordingly, we reverse Frederick's convictions for possession of cocaine and possession of paraphernalia and the corresponding sentences. See Watson v. State, 961 So.2d 1116 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007); Spataro v. State, 179 So.2d 873 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965). We affirm the remaining counts without comment.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part.

WHATLEY and STRINGER, JJ., Concur.

NOTES

[1] The paraphernalia Frederick was charged with possessing was the "baggie" which contained the crack cocaine. See § 893.145(10), Fla. Stat. (2006).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Frederick v. State, 980 So. 2d 1243, 2008 WL 1960258 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).

980 So. 2d 1243 (Frederick v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Watson v. State
961 So. 2d 1116 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
Spataro v. State
179 So. 2d 873 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1965)