Frederick v. State

520 So. 2d 704, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 825, 1988 WL 16995
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 2, 1988·No. No. 87-1467·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We find no merit in the appellant’s first point. As to the second point, the appellant’s remedy is a motion to withdraw plea or a rule 3.850 motion to vacate. See Counts v. State, 376 So.2d 59 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979).

Affirmed.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and HALL and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Frederick v. State, 520 So. 2d 704, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 825, 1988 WL 16995 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

520 So. 2d 704 (Frederick v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Counts v. State
376 So. 2d 59 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)