Frederick v. McCleskey
185 S.E. 722, 182 Ga. 468, 1936 Ga. LEXIS 454
This text of 185 S.E. 722 (Frederick v. McCleskey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Frederick v. McCleskey, 185 S.E. 722, 182 Ga. 468, 1936 Ga. LEXIS 454 (Ga. 1936).
Opinion
The exception is to a judgment refusing an interlocutory-in junction. The bill of exceptions recites that “There was no evidence adduced at said hearing, nor was any answer read.” The error assigned is that the judgment is contrary to law. Held, that the court did not err for any reason assigned, or because of anything appearing in the bill of exceptions or the record.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Associated Mutuals Inc. v. Coe
26 S.E.2d 450 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1943)
Moon v. Clark
14 S.E.2d 481 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1941)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
185 S.E. 722, 182 Ga. 468, 1936 Ga. LEXIS 454, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frederick-v-mccleskey-ga-1936.