Frederick v. Douglas Mobile Corp.

22 A.D.2d 972, 254 N.Y.S.2d 774, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2584
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 14, 1964
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 22 A.D.2d 972 (Frederick v. Douglas Mobile Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Frederick v. Douglas Mobile Corp., 22 A.D.2d 972, 254 N.Y.S.2d 774, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2584 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).

Opinion

Memorandum by the Court. The individual defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term denying their motion to dismiss the complaint upon the ground that the pleading fails to state a cause of action. (CPLR 3211, subd. [a], par. 7.) The complaint alleges the breach of a written agreement entered into by the parties whereby defendants, jointly and severally, agreed to repurchase from plaintiffs at a fixed price and within one year from its date 3,000 shares of the capital stock of defendant corporation delivered- ‘to them in part payment of the purchase price of a miniature automobile racetrack. Since time is not stated to be of the essence, we think that the motion was properly denied to permit the development at the trial of the circumstances bearing upon the materiality which the parties intended to accord the time provision of the contract. The prior denial of plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment is not res judicata. Order affirmed, with $10 ' costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Taylor and Aulisi, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mobil Oil Corp. v. Town of Huntington
85 Misc. 2d 800 (New York Supreme Court, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
22 A.D.2d 972, 254 N.Y.S.2d 774, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2584, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frederick-v-douglas-mobile-corp-nyappdiv-1964.