Frederick v. Cattaraugus County Department of Social Services

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Frederick v. Cattaraugus County Department of Social Services

302 A.D.2d 891, 753 N.Y.S.2d 906, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1013

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 7, 2003

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 302 A.D.2d 891 (Frederick v. Cattaraugus County Department of Social Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Frederick v. Cattaraugus County Department of Social Services, 302 A.D.2d 891, 753 N.Y.S.2d 906, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1013 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order of Family Court, Cattaraugus County (Kelly, J.H.O.), entered October 18, 2001, which, inter alia, ordered that petitioner have supervised visitation.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

[892]*892Memorandum: Family Court did not abuse its discretion in ordering that petitioner have supervised visitation with her two daughters and in denying her request for overnight visitation. The court’s determination is entitled to great deference (see Eschbach v Eschbach, 56 NY2d 167, 173) and will not be disturbed where, as here, it is supported by a sound and substantial basis in the record (see Matter of Green v Mitchell, 266 AD2d 884). Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Pine, Hurlbutt, Gorski and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of Family Court, Cattaraugus County (Kelly, J.H.O.), entered October 18, 2001, which, inter alia, ordered that petitioner have supervised visitation.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

[892]*892Memorandum: Family Court did not abuse its discretion in ordering that petitioner have supervised visitation with her two daughters and in denying her request for overnight visitation. The court’s determination is entitled to great deference (see Eschbach v Eschbach, 56 NY2d 167, 173) and will not be disturbed where, as here, it is supported by a sound and substantial basis in the record (see Matter of Green v Mitchell, 266 AD2d 884). Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Pine, Hurlbutt, Gorski and Lawton, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

302 A.D.2d 891, 753 N.Y.S.2d 906, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1013, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frederick-v-cattaraugus-county-department-of-social-services-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack