Frederick v. Cattaraugus County Department of Social Services

302 A.D.2d 891, 753 N.Y.S.2d 906, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1013
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 7, 2003·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal from an order of Family Court, Cattaraugus County (Kelly, J.H.O.), entered October 18, 2001, which, inter alia, ordered that petitioner have supervised visitation.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

[892] Memorandum: Family Court did not abuse its discretion in ordering that petitioner have supervised visitation with her two daughters and in denying her request for overnight visitation. The court’s determination is entitled to great deference (see Eschbach v Eschbach, 56 NY2d 167, 173) and will not be disturbed where, as here, it is supported by a sound and substantial basis in the record (see Matter of Green v Mitchell, 266 AD2d 884). Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Pine, Hurlbutt, Gorski and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Frederick v. Cattaraugus County Department of Social Services, 302 A.D.2d 891, 753 N.Y.S.2d 906, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1013 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

302 A.D.2d 891 (Frederick v. Cattaraugus County Department of Social Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Abrams v. Smith
2025 NY Slip Op 07160 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)