Frederick Street

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Frederick Street

26 A. 773, 155 Pa. 623, 1893 Pa. LEXIS 1295

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMay 31, 1893

DocketAppeal, No. 458

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 26 A. 773 (Frederick Street) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Frederick Street, 26 A. 773, 155 Pa. 623, 1893 Pa. LEXIS 1295 (Pa. 1893).

Pincite

Opinion

Per, Curiam,

There is nothing, of importance, in either of the twelve specifications of error, that is not sufficiently answered and satisfactorily disposed of in the opinion of the learned judge of the common pleas. The validity of the ordinance widening Frederick street was not an open question in this case: Hanover Borough’s Appeal, 150 Pa. 202. The viewers were appointed for the purpose of assessing damages and benefits resulting-from the laying out and widening of the street; and, as was said in Omega Street, 152 Pa. 129, it was the duty of all persons interested to appear before them and raise such questions of fact as they desired them to pass upon.

All the material questions, properly raised by the assignments of error, are rightly disposed of in the opinion referred to, and on that opinion the order, dismissing the exceptions and confirming report of the viewers, is affirmed with costs to be paid by the appellants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per, Curiam,

There is nothing, of importance, in either of the twelve specifications of error, that is not sufficiently answered and satisfactorily disposed of in the opinion of the learned judge of the common pleas. The validity of the ordinance widening Frederick street was not an open question in this case: Hanover Borough’s Appeal, 150 Pa. 202. The viewers were appointed for the purpose of assessing damages and benefits resulting-from the laying out and widening of the street; and, as was said in Omega Street, 152 Pa. 129, it was the duty of all persons interested to appear before them and raise such questions of fact as they desired them to pass upon.

All the material questions, properly raised by the assignments of error, are rightly disposed of in the opinion referred to, and on that opinion the order, dismissing the exceptions and confirming report of the viewers, is affirmed with costs to be paid by the appellants.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 A. 773, 155 Pa. 623, 1893 Pa. LEXIS 1295, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frederick-street-pa-1893.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack