Frederick R. Sears Et Al. v. Inhabitants of the Town of Nahant, Etc.

248 U.S. 543, 39 S. Ct. 133, 63 L. Ed. 413, 1918 U.S. LEXIS 1639
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided December 23, 1918·No. 61·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) McCain, v. Des Moines, 174 U. S. 168, 181; Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Ann Arbor R. R. Co., 178 U. S. 239, 243; Hull v. Burr, 234 U. S. 712, 720; Norton v. Whiteside, 239 U. S. 144, 147. (2) Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100; Empire State-Idaho Mining. Co. v. Hanley, 205 U. S. 225, 232; Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U. S. 71, 79; Brolan v. United States, 236 U. S. 216. (3) Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk &c. Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 596, 599; Cuyahoga River Power Co. v. Northern Realty Co., 244 U. S. 300, 304; Bilby v. Stewart, 246 U. S. 255, 257.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Frederick R. Sears Et Al. v. Inhabitants of the Town of Nahant, Etc., 248 U.S. 543, 39 S. Ct. 133, 63 L. Ed. 413, 1918 U.S. LEXIS 1639 (1918).

248 U.S. 543 (Frederick R. Sears Et Al. v. Inhabitants of the Town of Nahant, Etc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sloan v. Kubitsky, No. 309828 (Sep. 23, 1996)
1996 Conn. Super. Ct. 5598 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1996)