Frederick R. Sears Et Al. v. Inhabitants of the Town of Nahant, Etc.

Supreme Court

Frederick R. Sears Et Al. v. Inhabitants of the Town of Nahant, Etc.

248 U.S. 543, 39 S. Ct. 133, 63 L. Ed. 413, 1918 U.S. LEXIS 1639

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedDecember 23, 1918

Docket61

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 248 U.S. 543 (Frederick R. Sears Et Al. v. Inhabitants of the Town of Nahant, Etc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Frederick R. Sears Et Al. v. Inhabitants of the Town of Nahant, Etc., 248 U.S. 543, 39 S. Ct. 133, 63 L. Ed. 413, 1918 U.S. LEXIS 1639 (1918).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) McCain, v. Des Moines, 174 U. S. 168, 181; Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Ann Arbor R. R. Co., 178 U. S. 239, 243; Hull v. Burr, 234 U. S. 712, 720; Norton v. Whiteside, 239 U. S. 144, 147. (2) Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100; Empire State-Idaho Mining. Co. v. Hanley, 205 U. S. 225, 232; Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U. S. 71, 79; Brolan v. United States, 236 U. S. 216. (3) Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk &c. Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 596, 599; Cuyahoga River Power Co. v. Northern Realty Co., 244 U. S. 300, 304; Bilby v. Stewart, 246 U. S. 255, 257.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) McCain, v. Des Moines, 174 U. S. 168, 181; Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Ann Arbor R. R. Co., 178 U. S. 239, 243; Hull v. Burr, 234 U. S. 712, 720; Norton v. Whiteside, 239 U. S. 144, 147. (2) Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100; Empire State-Idaho Mining. Co. v. Hanley, 205 U. S. 225, 232; Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U. S. 71, 79; Brolan v. United States, 236 U. S. 216. (3) Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk &c. Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 596, 599; Cuyahoga River Power Co. v. Northern Realty Co., 244 U. S. 300, 304; Bilby v. Stewart, 246 U. S. 255, 257.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

248 U.S. 543, 39 S. Ct. 133, 63 L. Ed. 413, 1918 U.S. LEXIS 1639, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frederick-r-sears-et-al-v-inhabitants-of-the-town-of-nahant-etc-scotus-1918.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack