Frederick R. Sears Et Al. v. Inhabitants of the Town of Nahant, Etc.
Opinion
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) McCain, v. Des Moines, 174 U. S. 168, 181; Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Ann Arbor R. R. Co., 178 U. S. 239, 243; Hull v. Burr, 234 U. S. 712, 720; Norton v. Whiteside, 239 U. S. 144, 147. (2) Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100; Empire State-Idaho Mining. Co. v. Hanley, 205 U. S. 225, 232; Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U. S. 71, 79; Brolan v. United States, 236 U. S. 216. (3) Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk &c. Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 596, 599; Cuyahoga River Power Co. v. Northern Realty Co., 244 U. S. 300, 304; Bilby v. Stewart, 246 U. S. 255, 257.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
248 U.S. 543 (Frederick R. Sears Et Al. v. Inhabitants of the Town of Nahant, Etc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.