Frederick Payton v. North American Coal Corporation, Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor

835 F.2d 879, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 16197, 1987 WL 24070
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedDecember 10, 1987
Docket87-3592
StatusUnpublished

This text of 835 F.2d 879 (Frederick Payton v. North American Coal Corporation, Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Frederick Payton v. North American Coal Corporation, Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor, 835 F.2d 879, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 16197, 1987 WL 24070 (6th Cir. 1987).

Opinion

835 F.2d 879

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Frederick PAYTON, Petitioner,
v.
NORTH AMERICAN COAL CORPORATION, Director, Office of
Workers' Compensation Programs, United States
Department of Labor, Respondents.

No. 87-3592.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Dec. 10, 1987.

Before KEITH and WELLFORD, Circuit Judges, and THOMAS G. HULL, District Judge.*

ORDER

This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 9(b)(5), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination of the briefs and record, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a).

Petitioner filed a claim for compensation under the Black Lung Benefits Act, 30 U.S.C. Sec. 901 et seq., which was denied by an administrative law judge. The Benefits Review Board affirmed this decision, holding that the administrative law judge correctly found petitioner was not entitled to the interim presumption of disability found at 20 C.F.R. Sec. 727.203(a)(1) or (4). Petitioner now seeks review of the Board's decision. On this appeal the parties have briefed the issues, petitioner proceeding pro se.

Upon consideration, we affirm the decision of the Benefits Review Board for the reasons set forth in the Board's decision and order of May 29, 1987. Rule 9(b)(5), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

*

The Honorable Thomas G. Hull, Chief U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Tennessee, sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
835 F.2d 879, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 16197, 1987 WL 24070, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frederick-payton-v-north-american-coal-corporation-ca6-1987.