Frederick Mitchell v. State
This text of Frederick Mitchell v. State (Frederick Mitchell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismissed and Opinion Filed November 27, 2019.
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-01408-CR
FREDERICK MITCHELL, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 2 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F18-56989-I
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Molberg, Reichek, and Evans Opinion by Justice Molberg Frederick Mitchell pleaded guilty to possession of less than one gram of methamphetamine,
and the trial court placed him on deferred adjudication for three years. In September 2019, the
State filed a motion to proceed with an adjudication of guilt, alleging appellant had violated
numerous terms and conditions of his probation. On September 20, 2019, the trial court continued
appellant on probation, modifying the terms to include participation in a treatment program.
Appellant filed a notice of appeal on October 29, 2019.
As a general rule, an appellate court may consider appeals by criminal defendants only
after conviction. Wright v. State, 969 S.W.2d 588, 589 (Tex. App.—Dallas 1998, no pet.). With
regard to deferred adjudication, the Legislature has authorized appeal of only two types of orders:
(1) an order granting deferred adjudication, and (2) an order imposing punishment pursuant to an adjudication of guilt. Davis v. State, 195 S.W.3d 708, 711 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). Orders
modifying the terms or conditions of deferred adjudication are not in themselves appealable. Id.
Here, there is no judgment of conviction. Rather, the trial court continued appellant on
probation. We do not have jurisdiction over an order continuing a defendant on community
supervision. See id.
We dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
/Ken Molberg// KEN MOLBERG JUSTICE
Do Not Publish TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b)
191408f.u
–2– Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
FREDERICK MITCHELL, Appellant On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 2, Dallas County, Texas No. 05-19-01408-CR V. Trial Court Cause No. F18-56989-I. Opinion delivered by Justice Molberg, THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Justices Reichek and Evans participating.
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS this appeal.
Judgment entered this 27th day of November, 2019.
–3–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Frederick Mitchell v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frederick-mitchell-v-state-texapp-2019.