Frederick Lane Jones v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Frederick Lane Jones v. State

DecidedMay 9, 2013

Docket06-12-00195-CR

StatusPublished

This text of Frederick Lane Jones v. State (Frederick Lane Jones v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Frederick Lane Jones v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Frederick Lane Jones, Appellant Appeal from the 124th District Court of Gregg County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 38,837- No. 06-12-00195-CR v. B). Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice Moseley, Chief Justice Morriss and The State of Texas, Appellee Justice Carter participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find there was partial error in the judgment of the court below. Therefore, we modify the judgment to reflect the trial court’s oral pronouncement wherein it found Jones guilty of possession of four grams or more but less than 200 grams of cocaine with intent to deliver. We further modify the judgment to remove the language reflecting that the matter was submitted to the trial court as the result of a plea agreement. As modified, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. We note that the appellant, Frederick Lane Jones, has adequately indicated his inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED MAY 9, 2013 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Frederick Lane Jones, Appellant Appeal from the 124th District Court of Gregg County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 38,837- No. 06-12-00195-CR v. B). Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice Moseley, Chief Justice Morriss and The State of Texas, Appellee Justice Carter participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find there was partial error in the judgment of the court below. Therefore, we modify the judgment to reflect the trial court’s oral pronouncement wherein it found Jones guilty of possession of four grams or more but less than 200 grams of cocaine with intent to deliver. We further modify the judgment to remove the language reflecting that the matter was submitted to the trial court as the result of a plea agreement. As modified, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. We note that the appellant, Frederick Lane Jones, has adequately indicated his inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED MAY 9, 2013 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Frederick Lane Jones v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frederick-lane-jones-v-state-texapp-2013.