Frederick J. Frey v. Amoco Production Company

976 F.2d 242, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 26389, 1992 WL 281502
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Frederick J. Frey v. Amoco Production Company. Read the opinion of the Court — 951 F.2d 67
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided October 15, 1992·No. 90-3553·Published

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

Before REAVLEY, KING and JONES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

We originally held that royalties were due on lessee’s take-or-pay receipts under this lease. Frey v. Amoco Production Co., 943 F.2d 578 (5th Cir.1991). We then granted rehearing to certify to the Supreme Court of Louisiana that take-or-pay issue. 951 F.2d 67. The Louisiana court has now confirmed our original holding with a unanimous and thorough statement of the controlling state law. Frey v. Amoco Production Co., 603 So.2d 166 (La.1992). Accordingly, we reinstate Part IIA. of our opinion published at 943 F.2d 578, remand the case for further proceedings consistent with the court opinions, and deny further rehearing.

REVERSED AND REMANDED. REHEARING DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Frederick J. Frey v. Amoco Production Company, 976 F.2d 242, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 26389, 1992 WL 281502 (5th Cir. 1992).

976 F.2d 242 (Frederick J. Frey v. Amoco Production Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Frederick J. Frey v. Amoco Production Company
943 F.2d 578 (Fifth Circuit, 1991)
Frederick J. Frey v. Amoco Production Company
951 F.2d 67 (Fifth Circuit, 1992)
Frey v. Amoco Production Co.
603 So. 2d 166 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1992)