Frederick Henderson v. State of Arkansas

2026 Ark. App. 39

• Court: Court of Appeals of Arkansas
• Decided: January 21, 2026
• Status: Published

Opinion

Cite as 2026 Ark. App. 39 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION I No. CR-25-318

FREDERICK HENDERSON Opinion Delivered January 21, 2026 APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE MILLER COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT V. [NO. 46CR-19-74]

STATE OF ARKANSAS HONORABLE CARLTON D. JONES, APPELLEE JUDGE

MOTION TO WITHDRAW DENIED; ADVERSARY BRIEFING ORDERED

BRANDON J. HARRISON, Judge

On 24 February 2025, the Miller County Circuit Court revoked Frederick

Henderson’s probation and sentenced him to six years in the Arkansas Division of

Correction. It also imposed a $150 court cost, a $40 booking fee, and a $100 bailiff fee, and

ordered him to pay “all previously assessed fines, costs, restitution, etc. upon release.” Those

financial obligations included a balance from Henderson’s original sentence in March 2019

(a $1,000 fine, $150 court cost, $20 booking fee, $250 DNA sample fee, and $100 bailiff

fee), plus sentences at each of three previous revocation hearings to pay $150 in court costs,

a $40 booking fee, and a $100 bailiff fee. All four petitions to revoke alleged Henderson

had failed to pay his court-ordered financial obligations. A failure-to-pay finding was one

ground for the February 2025 revocation. Henderson, who has been homeless since at least 2019 according to his probation

officer, appealed. The circuit court substituted Phillip A. McGough for the public defender

to handle the appeal. He moves to withdraw under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967), and Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 4–3(b), contending no adverse ruling would be

a meritorious ground for appeal. His accompanying “no merit” brief focuses on support in

the record for the revocation findings.

McGough does not demonstrate that any part of Henderson’s revocation sentence

was authorized by statute. A sentence that is more severe, less severe, or different in kind

than the General Assembly has authorized is an illegal sentence. Ellis v. State, 2019 Ark.

286, 585 S.W.3d 661; Walden v. State, 2014 Ark. 193, 433 S.W.3d 864; Richie v. State, 2009

Ark. 602, 357 S.W.3d 909 (2009); Conic v. State, 2023 Ark. App. 145, 662 S.W.3d 707. A

criminal sentence includes the court costs and fees imposed. Hayes v. State, 2020 Ark. 297,

at 20 (reversing excessive $165 court cost). And an illegal sentence can be challenged on

appeal even if no objection was made in circuit court. Richie, supra.

When our review of the record in an Anders case reveals a nonfrivolous issue about

the legality of the sentence imposed, we deny counsel’s motion to withdraw and order

adversary briefing. Stanley v. State, 2023 Ark. App. 89, at 8 n.2, 661 S.W.3d 218, 222 n.2

(Harrison, C.J., dissenting) (collecting authorities). We have found no opinion of this court

or our supreme court that decides whether a circuit court has statutory authority to impose

these statutory fees and court costs at a revocation sentencing. An appeal of those issues

would not be frivolous. McGough is ordered to brief them (and any other merit issues he

2 may identify) within forty days or any extended time the court may allow. The State must

file a response brief in the normal course unless excused for good cause shown.

Motion to withdraw denied; adversary briefing ordered.

ABRAMSON and TUCKER, JJ., agree.

Phillip A. McGough, P.A., by: Phillip A. McGough, for appellant.

Tim Griffin, Att’y Gen., by: Michael Zangari, Ass’t Att’y Gen., for appellee.