Frederick George Roehler, II v. Robert Borg, Attorney General of the State of California
957 F.2d 729, 92 Daily Journal DAR 4888, 92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3078, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 6610
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Frederick George Roehler, II v. Robert Borg, Attorney General of the State of California. Read the opinion of the Court — 945 F.2d 303 →
Opinions
ORDER AND DISSENT FROM DENIAL OF LEAVE TO FILE A PETITION FOR REHEARING
The motion for leave to file petition for rehearing (and to file the associated petition for rehearing en banc) is DENIED.1
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Frederick George Roehler, II v. Robert Borg, Attorney General of the State of California, 957 F.2d 729, 92 Daily Journal DAR 4888, 92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3078, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 6610 (9th Cir. 1992).
957 F.2d 729 (Frederick George Roehler, II v. Robert Borg, Attorney General of the State of California) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Brown v. Allen
344 U.S. 443 (Supreme Court, 1953)
Jackson v. Virginia
443 U.S. 307 (Supreme Court, 1979)
McCleskey v. Zant
499 U.S. 467 (Supreme Court, 1991)
Coleman v. Thompson
501 U.S. 722 (Supreme Court, 1991)
Louis Eugene Russell v. Tom Rolfs, Superintendent
893 F.2d 1033 (Ninth Circuit, 1990)
Frederick George Roehler, II v. Robert Borg Attorney General of the State of California
945 F.2d 303 (Ninth Circuit, 1991)
Roehler v. California
474 U.S. 1021 (Supreme Court, 1985)