Frederick, Destyn David

Opinion

CAUSE NO. 04-14-0024-CR

PD-1334-15

MR. DESTYN DAVID FREDELB.IJSK. )f. § IN THE COURT OF [PRO-SE APPELLANT] NLtU IN COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS vs. § CRIMINAL APPEALS NOV 03 2015

THE STATE OF TEXAS [APPELLEE] „. . § AUSTIN/ TEXAS Abel Acosta, Clerk

RECEIVED IN

COURT CF CRi^lMAL APPEALS APPELLANT'S MOTION PLEADING SINGLE-COPY TO FILE HIS ..-.. nQ onir PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW PURSUANT TO RULES NUV U<i lUU OF APPELLATE PROCEDURES/ RULE 9.3.

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE(S) OF SAID COURT:

NOW CONES Mr. Destyn D. Frederick/ TDCJ-ID #1920865/ pro-se Appe llant styled hereinafter/ and respectfully presents this Motion Plead ing Single-Copy to file His accompanying PDR pursuant to Rule 9.3 of the Rules of Appllate Procedures. In support hereto, the Appellant shows the following:

I.

In accords with rules governing the filing of a Petition for Dis cretionary Reiew/ the Appellant is instructed that He must present the Court with eleven (11) copies of His PDR. The Appellant's appe llate attorney (Richard E. Langl-ois), inter-alai/ failed to mention this fact to the Appellant before he withdrew from the Appellant's case.

II.

The Facility where the Apellant resides does not provide avenues for its litigants to use a copier. Thus being the case, and being that the Appellant is a "pro-se" litigant, He ask that this Honorable Court suspend Rule 9.3 and allow Him to file one (1) copy only of His Petition For Discretionary Review.

PRAYER

ALL PREMISES CONSIDERED, the Appellant PRAYS that this Motion is GRANTED and allow Him to file one (1) copy only of His enclosed PDR.

1 of 2

Respectfully submitted,

Mr. Destyn D. Frederick #1920865 The Connally Facilities 899 FM 632 Kenedy, Texas 78119-4516

2 of 2