Frederick Brewster v. Wachovia Mortgage

699 F. App'x 706
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided October 26, 2017·No. 12-35561·Unpublished

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Wells Fargo Bank, NA, appeals from the district court’s order awarding it $5,000 in attorney’s fees and costs on its motion for an attorney’s fees award in the amount of $29,561.40. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We vacate and remand.

We are unable to review the district court’s order awarding attorney’s fees to Wells Fargo because the district court did not provide an adequate explanation for its decision. See Carter v. Caleb Brett LLC, 757 F.3d 866, 868-69 (9th Cir. 2014) (a district court is required to reach attorney’s fee decisions by considering the factors set forth in Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc., 526 F.2d 67, 70 (9th Cir. 1975) and “must also explain how it arrived at its determination with sufficient specificity to permit an appellate court to determine whether the district court abused its discretion in the way the analysis was undertaken.” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)). We vacate the district court’s order awarding attorney’s fees and remand for the district court to articulate the basis for its fee determination with sufficient specificity.

The parties shall bear their own costs on appeal.

VACATED and REMANDED.

**

This disposition is not'appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Frederick Brewster v. Wachovia Mortgage, 699 F. App'x 706 (9th Cir. 2017).

699 F. App'x 706 (Frederick Brewster v. Wachovia Mortgage) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rick Carter v. Caleb Brett LLC
757 F.3d 866 (Ninth Circuit, 2014)
Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc.
526 F.2d 67 (Ninth Circuit, 1975)