Frederick B. Wright v. Charlyne A. Wright

Court of Appeals of Texas

Frederick B. Wright v. Charlyne A. Wright

DecidedMay 6, 2004

Docket13-03-00631-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Frederick B. Wright v. Charlyne A. Wright (Frederick B. Wright v. Charlyne A. Wright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Frederick B. Wright v. Charlyne A. Wright, (Tex. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

NUMBER 13-03-631-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

___________________________________________________________________

FREDERICK B. WRIGHT, Appellant,

v.

CHARLYNE A. WRIGHT, Appellee.

___________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 308^th District Court of Harris County, Texas.

___________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Castillo, and Garza

Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, FREDERICK B. WRIGHT, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 308th District Court of Harris County, Texas, in cause number 9601128. The notice of appeal was filed on September 12, 2003.

Upon inspection of the notice of appeal, it appeared that said notice of appeal did not comply with Tex. R. App. P. 25.1(e). Notice of this defect was given to appellant, and on December 8, 2003, appellant’s amended notice of appeal was received in this Court. Said amended notice of appeal failed to comply with Tex. R. App. P. 25.1(e).

Pursuant to Tex. Gov’t Code §51.207(b)(1) and § 51.941(a)(1), a filing fee in the amount of $125.00 is due upon the filing of an appeal. To date, appellant has failed to pay the filing fee.

On January 28, 2004, pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), notice was given to appellant that this appeal was subject to dismissal for failure to comply with the rules of appellate procedure and this Court’s notice. Appellant was advised that, unless the defects were corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this Court’s notice or grounds were given for continuing the appeal, this appeal would be dismissed. To date, appellant has failed to respond to this Court’s notice.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant’s failure to comply with the rules, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Opinion delivered and filed this

the 6^th day of May, 2004

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NUMBER 13-03-631-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

___________________________________________________________________

FREDERICK B. WRIGHT, Appellant,

v.

CHARLYNE A. WRIGHT, Appellee.

___________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 308^th District Court of Harris County, Texas.

___________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Castillo, and Garza

Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, FREDERICK B. WRIGHT, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 308th District Court of Harris County, Texas, in cause number 9601128. The notice of appeal was filed on September 12, 2003.

Upon inspection of the notice of appeal, it appeared that said notice of appeal did not comply with Tex. R. App. P. 25.1(e). Notice of this defect was given to appellant, and on December 8, 2003, appellant’s amended notice of appeal was received in this Court. Said amended notice of appeal failed to comply with Tex. R. App. P. 25.1(e).

Pursuant to Tex. Gov’t Code §51.207(b)(1) and § 51.941(a)(1), a filing fee in the amount of $125.00 is due upon the filing of an appeal. To date, appellant has failed to pay the filing fee.

On January 28, 2004, pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), notice was given to appellant that this appeal was subject to dismissal for failure to comply with the rules of appellate procedure and this Court’s notice. Appellant was advised that, unless the defects were corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this Court’s notice or grounds were given for continuing the appeal, this appeal would be dismissed. To date, appellant has failed to respond to this Court’s notice.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant’s failure to comply with the rules, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Opinion delivered and filed this

the 6^th day of May, 2004

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Frederick B. Wright v. Charlyne A. Wright, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frederick-b-wright-v-charlyne-a-wright-texapp-2004.