Frederick B. Cooper Co. v. United States

27 Cust. Ct. 369, 1951 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1279
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedDecember 3, 1951
DocketNo. 56108; protest 171324-K (New York)
StatusPublished

This text of 27 Cust. Ct. 369 (Frederick B. Cooper Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Frederick B. Cooper Co. v. United States, 27 Cust. Ct. 369, 1951 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1279 (cusc 1951).

Opinion

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It was stipulated that the issue and merchandise herein are the same in all material respects as those involved in Axel Stokby et al. v. United States (4 Cust. Ct. 343, C. D. 358), except that in the liquidation of the entries covered by the instant protest, an allowance was made for gelatinous substance equal to 10 percent of the content of the tins, whereas the percentage of gelatinous substance should have been 19.8 percent as to entry 762940 and 28.3 percent as to entry 762941. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited the merchandise was held dutiable at 3}i cents per pound under paragraph 703, Tariff Act of 1930, upon the basis of the net weight of the contents of the cans, less 19.8 percent and 28.3 percent allowance on entries 762940 and 762941, respectively, for the weight of the gelatinous material.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stokby v. United States
4 Cust. Ct. 343 (U.S. Customs Court, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
27 Cust. Ct. 369, 1951 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1279, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frederick-b-cooper-co-v-united-states-cusc-1951.