Frederick Altyman Brown (Jr.) v. Joe Jordan Trucks, Inc.
This text of Frederick Altyman Brown (Jr.) v. Joe Jordan Trucks, Inc. (Frederick Altyman Brown (Jr.) v. Joe Jordan Trucks, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISMISS and Opinion Filed December 13, 2021
S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-21-00821-CV
FREDERICK ALTYMAN BROWN (JR.), Appellant V. JOE JORDAN TRUCKS, INC., Appellee
On Appeal from the 191st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-19-20105
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Reichek, Nowell, and Carlyle Opinion by Justice Reichek The deadline for filing this appeal, from the trial court’s March 25, 2021
summary judgment, was June 23, 2021 or, with an extension motion, July 8, 2021.
See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(a)(1). The notice of appeal was not filed, however, until
September 21, 2021.
Because the timely filing of a notice of appeal is jurisdictional, we questioned
our jurisdiction over the appeal and directed appellant to file a letter brief addressing
our concern. See Brashear v. Victoria Gardens of McKinney, L.L.C., 302 S.W.3d
542, 545 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2009, no pet.) (op. on reh’g). Appellant complied,
seemingly relying, in relevant part, on the tolling of deadlines in the Texas Supreme Court’s emergency Covid-19 orders.1 As appellee notes in response, however,
appellant did not separately request an extension of time to file the notice of appeal.
See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3. And, while an extension request can be implied when the
notice of appeal is filed within the extension period, we cannot imply an extension
request when, as here, the notice of appeal is filed outside the extension period. See
Naaman v. Grider, 126 S.W.3d 73, 74 (Tex. 2003) (per curiam); Verburgt v. Dorner,
959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997). Accordingly, on the record before us, we dismiss
the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a).
/Amanda L. Reichek/ AMANDA L. REICHEK JUSTICE
210821F.P05
1 Although appellant’s letter brief appears to address only the merits of his appeal, the letter states it is in response to our request for jurisdictional briefing. Accordingly, we have liberally construed the brief as also addressing the timeliness of the appeal. –2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
FREDERICK ALTYMAN BROWN On Appeal from the 191st Judicial (JR.), Appellant District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-19-20105. No. 05-21-00821-CV V. Opinion delivered by Justice Reichek, Justices Nowell and Carlyle JOE JORDAN TRUCKS, INC., participating. Appellee
In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.
We ORDER that appellee Joe Jordan Trucks, Inc. recover its costs, if any, of this appeal from appellant Frederick Altyman Brown (Jr.).
Judgment entered December 13, 2021.
–3–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Frederick Altyman Brown (Jr.) v. Joe Jordan Trucks, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frederick-altyman-brown-jr-v-joe-jordan-trucks-inc-texapp-2021.