Frederick A. Meagher Co. v. Murphy

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Frederick A. Meagher Co. v. Murphy

11 Mass. App. Ct. 965

DecidedMarch 6, 1981

StatusPublished

This text of 11 Mass. App. Ct. 965 (Frederick A. Meagher Co. v. Murphy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Appeals Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Frederick A. Meagher Co. v. Murphy, 11 Mass. App. Ct. 965 (Mass. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

No showing has been made that the judge did not follow the criteria set forth in Packaging Indus. Group, Inc. v. Cheney, 380 Mass. 609, 616-622 (1980), in issuing the limited preliminary injunction, based on the defendant’s noncompetition agreement, which precluded him from “soliciting or accepting any insurance accounts or business” which were current accounts of the plaintiff as of the date of the defendant’s resignation as an employee of the plaintiff.

Order denying motion to vacate preliminary injunction affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

No showing has been made that the judge did not follow the criteria set forth in Packaging Indus. Group, Inc. v. Cheney, 380 Mass. 609, 616-622 (1980), in issuing the limited preliminary injunction, based on the defendant’s noncompetition agreement, which precluded him from “soliciting or accepting any insurance accounts or business” which were current accounts of the plaintiff as of the date of the defendant’s resignation as an employee of the plaintiff.

Order denying motion to vacate preliminary injunction affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 Mass. App. Ct. 965, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frederick-a-meagher-co-v-murphy-massappct-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack