Frederick A. Jeter v. George N. Martin, Iii, Warden Attorney of the State of South Carolina

Fourth Circuit

Frederick A. Jeter v. George N. Martin, Iii, Warden Attorney of the State of South Carolina

37 F.3d 1494, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 34847, 1994 WL 557075

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 12, 1994·No. 94-6408·Published

Opinion

37 F.3d 1494
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Frederick A. JETER, Petitioner Appellant,
v.
George N. MARTIN, III, Warden; Attorney of the State of
South Carolina, Respondents Appellees.

No. 94-6408.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 19, 1994.
Decided Oct. 12, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Falcon B. Hawkins, Chief District Judge. (CA-93-44-3-11AK)

Frederick A. Jeter, Appellant Pro Se.

Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, SC, for Appellees.

D.S.C.

DISMISSED.

Before WIDENER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Jeter v. Martin, No. CA-93-44-3-11AK (D.S.C. Mar. 18, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

37 F.3d 1494
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Frederick A. JETER, Petitioner Appellant,
v.
George N. MARTIN, III, Warden; Attorney of the State of
South Carolina, Respondents Appellees.

No. 94-6408.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 19, 1994.
Decided Oct. 12, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Falcon B. Hawkins, Chief District Judge. (CA-93-44-3-11AK)

Frederick A. Jeter, Appellant Pro Se.

Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, SC, for Appellees.

D.S.C.

DISMISSED.

Before WIDENER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Jeter v. Martin, No. CA-93-44-3-11AK (D.S.C. Mar. 18, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Frederick A. Jeter v. George N. Martin, Iii, Warden Attorney of the State of South Carolina, 37 F.3d 1494, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 34847, 1994 WL 557075 (4th Cir. 1994).

Pincite

37 F.3d 1494 (Frederick A. Jeter v. George N. Martin, Iii, Warden Attorney of the State of South Carolina) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.