Frederick A. G. (Anonymous) v. Doris G. (Anonymous)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Frederick A. G. (Anonymous) v. Doris G. (Anonymous)

37 A.D.2d 717, 324 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3541

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 6, 1971

StatusPublished

This text of 37 A.D.2d 717 (Frederick A. G. (Anonymous) v. Doris G. (Anonymous)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Frederick A. G. (Anonymous) v. Doris G. (Anonymous), 37 A.D.2d 717, 324 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3541 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

In a habeas corpus proceeding for custody of the two children of the parties, relator appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered November 25, 1970, which inter alia awarded custody to respondent. Judgment reversed, on the law and in the interests of justice, without costs, and proceeding remanded to the Special Term for a new trial, before another Judge. In our opinion, the Special Term should not have excluded the father from the proceedings. We therefore think that, in the interests of justice, a new trial should be held, before another Judge. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuseello, Shapiro, 'Gulotta and Benjamin, JJ., concur,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a habeas corpus proceeding for custody of the two children of the parties, relator appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered November 25, 1970, which inter alia awarded custody to respondent. Judgment reversed, on the law and in the interests of justice, without costs, and proceeding remanded to the Special Term for a new trial, before another Judge. In our opinion, the Special Term should not have excluded the father from the proceedings. We therefore think that, in the interests of justice, a new trial should be held, before another Judge. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuseello, Shapiro, 'Gulotta and Benjamin, JJ., concur,

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

37 A.D.2d 717, 324 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3541, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frederick-a-g-anonymous-v-doris-g-anonymous-nyappdiv-1971.