Frederic v. Mayers

43 So. 677, 89 Miss. 127
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 15, 1906
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 43 So. 677 (Frederic v. Mayers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Frederic v. Mayers, 43 So. 677, 89 Miss. 127 (Mich. 1906).

Opinion

Calhoon, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

By the correspondence in 1874, exhibits “A” and “B” to the bill, Smith got more than a mere license, revocable by Frederic. He got the right to exclusive use of the property, terminable only by his death or ceasing to publish the Star. The successive holders claimed under him. So does Mayers, and he held for twenty years under that right, as was well known to, fully recognized by, and acquiesced in by, Frederic, who, besides, saw Mayers, under that claim, spend a large sum in enlarging the building. Frederic, while alive, fully and accurately defined Mayers’ legal rights, when'he repeatdly said he had the property as long as he published a newspaper thereon, when it would revert to his estate. When Mayers ceases to publish this paper [141]*141there, or dies, Frederic’s heirs are entitled to possession of the fee, but not until then. Mayers has the easement by the statute of limitations and by estoppel.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brock v. Kelly
44 So. 2d 452 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1950)
Cusimano v. Spencer
13 So. 2d 27 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1943)
Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. Dorsey
149 So. 759 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
43 So. 677, 89 Miss. 127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frederic-v-mayers-miss-1906.