Frederic R. Harris, Inc. v. The Metropolitan Government of Nashville, and Davidson County

CourtCourt of Appeals of Tennessee
DecidedMarch 25, 1999
DocketA1-A-01-9803-CH00130
StatusPublished

This text of Frederic R. Harris, Inc. v. The Metropolitan Government of Nashville, and Davidson County (Frederic R. Harris, Inc. v. The Metropolitan Government of Nashville, and Davidson County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Frederic R. Harris, Inc. v. The Metropolitan Government of Nashville, and Davidson County, (Tenn. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

F R E D E R IC R . H A R R IS , IN C ., ) ) P la in tiff /A p p e lla n t, ) A p p e al N o .

FL E I D ) 0 1 -A -0 1 -9 8 0 3 -C H -0 0 1 3 0 v . ) ) D a v id s o n C h a n c e ry T H E M E T R O P O L IT A N ) N o . 9 5 -5 3 7 -II M a rc h 2 5 , 1 9 9 9 G O V E R N M E N T O F N A S H V IL L E ) a n d D A V ID S O N C O U N T Y , ) C e c il C r o w s o n , J r . T E N N E S S E E , ) A p p e lla te C o u r t C le r k ) D e fe n d a n t/A p p e lle e . ) )

C O U R T O F A P P E A L S O F T E N N E S S E E

A P P E A L F R O M T H E C H A N C E R Y C O U R T F O R D A V ID S O N C O U N T Y ,

A T N A S H V IL L E , T E N N E S S E E

T H E H O N O R A B L E C A R O L L . M cC O Y , C H A N C E L L O R

P E T E R H . C U R R Y T u k e Y o p p & S w e en e y N a tio n s B a n k P la z a , S u i te 1 1 0 0 4 1 4 U n io n S tr e e t N a s h v ille , T e n n e s se e 3 7 2 1 9 A T T O R N E Y F O R P L A IN T IF F /A P P E L L A N T

JO H N L . K E N N E D Y M e tro p o l it a n A t to r n e y T h e D e p a rtm e n t o f L a w o f T h e M e tr o p o lita n G o v e rn m e n t o f N a sh v il l e a n d D a v id s o n C o u n ty 2 0 4 M e tr o p o lita n C o u r th o u s e N ashv ille , T e n n e s se e 3 7 2 0 1 A T T O R N E Y F O R D E F E N D A N T /A P P E L L E E

R E V E R S E D A N D R E M A N D E D

W IL L IA M B . C A IN , J U D G E O P I N I O N

F re d e ric R . H a r r i s , I n c . ( F R H ) , f o r m e r ly P R C E n g in e e r in g , I n c . , e n t e r e d i n t o a c o n tr a c t w i t h th e M e tr o p o li t a n G o v e rn m e n t o f N a s h v il l e a n d D a v id s o n C o u n ty (M e tro ), w h e re b y F R H a g re e d to p ro v id e c o m p u te r d e sig n s e rv ic e s to M e t r o o n a c o s t - p l u s - f e e b a s i s . F R H p r o m i s e d to p r o v i d e e n g i n e e r i n g s e rv i c e s fo r th e d e s ig n a n d im p le m e n ta tio n o f a C o m p u teriz e d T ra ffic S ig n a l S y ste m fo r M e tro . T h e o ri g i n a l c o n tr a c t , d a te d O c to b e r 2 1 , 1 9 8 5 , p r o v i d e d fo r t h e c o m p e n s a tio n a n d p e r fo r m a n c e o f o n e “ S y s te m D e s ig n P h a s e ” w ith a n o p tio n to c o n ti n u e t h e re la ti o n s h i p o v e r f i v e a d d i t i o n a l p h a s e s . T h e e v e n tu a l g o a l w a s th a t t h i s n e w s y s t e m w o u l d u t i l i z e a s p e c i a l t y p e o f s o f t w a r e to c o n tr o l t r a f f i c a t f i v e h u n d re d a n d fifty (5 5 0 ) in te rs e c tio n s th ro u g h o u t th e c ity o f N a sh v ille .

I. C o n trac t T e rm s T h e d o c u m e n ts e x e c u te d b y th e p a rtie s c o n ta in e d te n g e n e r a l a rtic le s a n d o n e e x h ib i t d e n o m i n a te d “ S c o p e o f S e r v i c e s .” A m o n g t h o s e g e n e r a l p r o v i s i o n s , A rtic le s 6 , 7 a n d 1 0 a re o f p a rtic u la r im p o rta n c e to th e re s o lu tio n o f th e is s u e b e fo re u s.

T h e y re a d in p e rtin e n t p a rt: A r ticle 6 . L im ita tio n o f C o st A . I t i s e s t i m a t e d t h a t th e t o t a l c o s t t o t h e C L I E N T , e x c l u s i v e o f a n y f ix e d fe e , fo r th e p e rfo rm a n c e o f w o rk p u rs u a n t to th is a g r e e m e n t , s h a ll n o t e x c e e d T H R E E H U N D R E D F O R T Y - T W O T H O U S A N D , F O U R H U N D R E D , T W E N T Y -F O U R D O L L A R S ( $ 3 4 2 ,4 2 4 .0 0 ) . T h is a m o u n t r e fle c ts th e e s tim a te d c o s ts fo r th e S Y S T E M D E S IG N P H A S E - C O N T R A C T IT E M 1 a s d e t a ile d in th e a tta c h e d S c o p e o f S e r v ic e s ( E x h ib it A ) .

T h e C O N T R A C T O R a g re e s to e x e rt its b e s t e ff o rts to p e rf o rm th e w o r k a s s p e c i f i e d i n E x h i b i t A , “ S c o p e o f S e r v i c e s ,” a n d a ll o b l i g a ti o n s u n d e r t h i s A g r e e m e n t w i t h i n s u c h e s t im a t e d c o s t s . I f a t a n y t i m e th e C O N S U L T A N T h a s r e a s o n to b e l ie v e t h a t th e c o s ts to b e in c u rr e d a g a in s t th is A g re e m e n t w ith in th e n e x t s u c c e e d in g s ix ty ( 6 0 ) d a y s , w h e n a d d e d to a ll c o s t s p r e v io u s l y in c u rr e d , e x c l u s i v e o f a n y fix e d fe e , w ill b e s u b s ta n t ia lly g r e a te r o r le s s th a n th e e s tim a te d to ta l c o s ts s e t fo rth in th is A rtic le 6 , th e C O N S U L T A N T s h a ll n o t if y t h e C L I E N T i n w r i ti n g t o t h a t e f f e c t , g i v i n g th e re v is e d e s tim a te o f s u c h to ta l c o s t fo r th e p e rf o rm a n c e o f th is A g re e m e n t.

2 B . T h e C L I E N T s h a l l n o t b e o b li g a te d to r e im b u r s e th e C O N S U L T A N T fo r c o s ts in c u r re d in ex ce ss o f th e e s ti m a t e d c o s t s e t fo rth in th is A rtic le 6 , u n le s s an d u n til th e C L I E N T s h a ll h a v e n o tif ie d th e C O N S U L T A N T in w ritin g th a t s u c h e s tim a te d c o s t h a s b e e n in c r e a s e d a n d shall h a v e s p e c ifie d in s u c h n o tic e a r e v i s e d e s tim a te d c o s t w h ic h s h a ll th e re u p o n c o n s titu t e th e e s tim a te d c o s t o f th i s A greem e n t.

* * * A r t ic le 7 . P a y m e n t

A . F o r th e p e rfo r m a n c e o f th is A g re e m e n t, th e C L IE N T s h a ll p a y th e C O N S U L T A N T a llo w a b l e c o s ts in a c c o r d a n c e w ith th e t e r m s a n d c o n d i t i o n s a s s e t f o r t h a b o v e . I n a d d it i o n t o t h e p a y m e n ts f o r a ll o w a b l e c o s t s a s h e r e in b e f o r e p r o v i d e d , th e C L I E N T a g r e e s to p a y th e C O N S U L T A N T th e s u m o f T H IR T Y -F O U R T H O U S A N D , T W O H U N D R E D F O R T Y - T W O D O L L A R S ( $ 3 4 ,2 4 2 .0 0 ) , a n d it i s a g r e e d a n d u n d e rs to o d t h a t th i s w i ll c o n s t i tu t e f u ll c o m p e n s a tio n to th e C O N S U L T A N T fo r fix e d fe e c o v e rin g a ll s e rv ic e s a n d w o r k r e q u i r e d b y th e c o n tr a c t ite m s c o v e r e d u n d e r th i s A g r e e m e n t u n le s s s u c h a m o u n t s h a ll b e a m e n d e d in w r i t i n g b y th e C L IE N T .

B . O n c e e a c h m o n th , th e C O N S U L T A N T s h a ll s u b m it to th e C L I E N T a c e rtif ie d in v o ic e fo r a llo w a b le c o s ts in c u rr e d in th e p e r fo r m a n c e o f th is A g r e e m e n t.

* * * A r t ic l e 1 0 . G e n e r a l P r o v is io n s

T h e f o llo w in g g e n e ra l p r o v is io n s a re in c o rp o r a te d h e r e in a n d m a d e a p a r t h e r e o f:

A . C h a n g es . T h e p a rtie s h e re to m a y fr o m tim e to tim e r e q u i r e c h a n g e s in t h e S c o p e o f s e r v i c e s a n d t h e t i m e o f p e r f o r m a n c e a s s e t f o r t h h e re in . S u c h c h a n g e s , in c lu d in g a n y in c r e a s e o r d e c r e a s e in t h e a m o u n t o f th e c o m p e n s a tio n to th e C O N S U L T A N T , w h i c h a re m u tu a ll y a g r e e d u p o n b y a n d b e t w e e n t h e p a rtie s h e r e to , s h a l l b e in c o rp o ra te d a s w ritte n a m e n d m e n t s to th is A g r e e m e n t. A n y c la im b y th e C O N S U L T A N T f o r a n a d ju s t m e n t u n d e r th is c la u s e m u s t b e a s s e rte d w ith in th irty (3 0 ) d a y s fr o m th e d a t e o f th e re c e ip t b y th e C O N S U L T A N T o f t h e n o tific a tio n o f c h a n g e ; p ro v id e d , h o w e v e r, th a t th e C L I E N T m a y , if e q u ity is o b ta in e d , re c e iv e a n d a c t u p o n a n y s u c h c la im a s se rte d a t a n y tim e p rio r to f i n a l p a y m e n t u n d e r th is A g r e e m e n t.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Frederic R. Harris, Inc. v. The Metropolitan Government of Nashville, and Davidson County, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frederic-r-harris-inc-v-the-metropolitan-government-of-nashville-and-tennctapp-1999.