Frederic R. Harris, Inc. v. The Metropolitan Government of Nashville, and Davidson County

Court of Appeals of Tennessee·Decided March 25, 1999·No. A1-A-01-9803-CH00130·Published

Opinion

F R E D E R IC R . H A R R IS , IN C ., ) ) P la in tiff /A p p e lla n t, ) A p p e al N o .

FL E I D ) 0 1 -A -0 1 -9 8 0 3 -C H -0 0 1 3 0 v . ) ) D a v id s o n C h a n c e ry T H E M E T R O P O L IT A N ) N o . 9 5 -5 3 7 -II M a rc h 2 5 , 1 9 9 9 G O V E R N M E N T O F N A S H V IL L E ) a n d D A V ID S O N C O U N T Y , ) C e c il C r o w s o n , J r . T E N N E S S E E , ) A p p e lla te C o u r t C le r k ) D e fe n d a n t/A p p e lle e . ) )

C O U R T O F A P P E A L S O F T E N N E S S E E

A P P E A L F R O M T H E C H A N C E R Y C O U R T F O R D A V ID S O N C O U N T Y ,

A T N A S H V IL L E , T E N N E S S E E

T H E H O N O R A B L E C A R O L L . M cC O Y , C H A N C E L L O R

P E T E R H . C U R R Y T u k e Y o p p & S w e en e y N a tio n s B a n k P la z a , S u i te 1 1 0 0 4 1 4 U n io n S tr e e t N a s h v ille , T e n n e s se e 3 7 2 1 9 A T T O R N E Y F O R P L A IN T IF F /A P P E L L A N T

JO H N L . K E N N E D Y M e tro p o l it a n A t to r n e y T h e D e p a rtm e n t o f L a w o f T h e M e tr o p o lita n G o v e rn m e n t o f N a sh v il l e a n d D a v id s o n C o u n ty 2 0 4 M e tr o p o lita n C o u r th o u s e N ashv ille , T e n n e s se e 3 7 2 0 1 A T T O R N E Y F O R D E F E N D A N T /A P P E L L E E

R E V E R S E D A N D R E M A N D E D

W IL L IA M B . C A IN , J U D G E O P I N I O N

F re d e ric R . H a r r i s , I n c . ( F R H ) , f o r m e r ly P R C E n g in e e r in g , I n c . , e n t e r e d i n t o a c o n tr a c t w i t h th e M e tr o p o li t a n G o v e rn m e n t o f N a s h v il l e a n d D a v id s o n C o u n ty (M e tro ), w h e re b y F R H a g re e d to p ro v id e c o m p u te r d e sig n s e rv ic e s to M e t r o o n a c o s t - p l u s - f e e b a s i s . F R H p r o m i s e d to p r o v i d e e n g i n e e r i n g s e rv i c e s fo r th e d e s ig n a n d im p le m e n ta tio n o f a C o m p u teriz e d T ra ffic S ig n a l S y ste m fo r M e tro . T h e o ri g i n a l c o n tr a c t , d a te d O c to b e r 2 1 , 1 9 8 5 , p r o v i d e d fo r t h e c o m p e n s a tio n a n d p e r fo r m a n c e o f o n e “ S y s te m D e s ig n P h a s e ” w ith a n o p tio n to c o n ti n u e t h e re la ti o n s h i p o v e r f i v e a d d i t i o n a l p h a s e s . T h e e v e n tu a l g o a l w a s th a t t h i s n e w s y s t e m w o u l d u t i l i z e a s p e c i a l t y p e o f s o f t w a r e to c o n tr o l t r a f f i c a t f i v e h u n d re d a n d fifty (5 5 0 ) in te rs e c tio n s th ro u g h o u t th e c ity o f N a sh v ille .

I. C o n trac t T e rm s T h e d o c u m e n ts e x e c u te d b y th e p a rtie s c o n ta in e d te n g e n e r a l a rtic le s a n d o n e e x h ib i t d e n o m i n a te d “ S c o p e o f S e r v i c e s .” A m o n g t h o s e g e n e r a l p r o v i s i o n s , A rtic le s 6 , 7 a n d 1 0 a re o f p a rtic u la r im p o rta n c e to th e re s o lu tio n o f th e is s u e b e fo re u s.

T h e y re a d in p e rtin e n t p a rt: A r ticle 6 . L im ita tio n o f C o st A . I t i s e s t i m a t e d t h a t th e t o t a l c o s t t o t h e C L I E N T , e x c l u s i v e o f a n y f ix e d fe e , fo r th e p e rfo rm a n c e o f w o rk p u rs u a n t to th is a g r e e m e n t , s h a ll n o t e x c e e d T H R E E H U N D R E D F O R T Y - T W O T H O U S A N D , F O U R H U N D R E D , T W E N T Y -F O U R D O L L A R S ( $ 3 4 2 ,4 2 4 .0 0 ) . T h is a m o u n t r e fle c ts th e e s tim a te d c o s ts fo r th e S Y S T E M D E S IG N P H A S E - C O N T R A C T IT E M 1 a s d e t a ile d in th e a tta c h e d S c o p e o f S e r v ic e s ( E x h ib it A ) .

T h e C O N T R A C T O R a g re e s to e x e rt its b e s t e ff o rts to p e rf o rm th e w o r k a s s p e c i f i e d i n E x h i b i t A , “ S c o p e o f S e r v i c e s ,” a n d a ll o b l i g a ti o n s u n d e r t h i s A g r e e m e n t w i t h i n s u c h e s t im a t e d c o s t s . I f a t a n y t i m e th e C O N S U L T A N T h a s r e a s o n to b e l ie v e t h a t th e c o s ts to b e in c u rr e d a g a in s t th is A g re e m e n t w ith in th e n e x t s u c c e e d in g s ix ty ( 6 0 ) d a y s , w h e n a d d e d to a ll c o s t s p r e v io u s l y in c u rr e d , e x c l u s i v e o f a n y fix e d fe e , w ill b e s u b s ta n t ia lly g r e a te r o r le s s th a n th e e s tim a te d to ta l c o s ts s e t fo rth in th is A rtic le 6 , th e C O N S U L T A N T s h a ll n o t if y t h e C L I E N T i n w r i ti n g t o t h a t e f f e c t , g i v i n g th e re v is e d e s tim a te o f s u c h to ta l c o s t fo r th e p e rf o rm a n c e o f th is A g re e m e n t.

2 B . T h e C L I E N T s h a l l n o t b e o b li g a te d to r e im b u r s e th e C O N S U L T A N T fo r c o s ts in c u r re d in ex ce ss o f th e e s ti m a t e d c o s t s e t fo rth in th is A rtic le 6 , u n le s s an d u n til th e C L I E N T s h a ll h a v e n o tif ie d th e C O N S U L T A N T in w ritin g th a t s u c h e s tim a te d c o s t h a s b e e n in c r e a s e d a n d shall h a v e s p e c ifie d in s u c h n o tic e a r e v i s e d e s tim a te d c o s t w h ic h s h a ll th e re u p o n c o n s titu t e th e e s tim a te d c o s t o f th i s A greem e n t.

* * * A r t ic le 7 . P a y m e n t

A . F o r th e p e rfo r m a n c e o f th is A g re e m e n t, th e C L IE N T s h a ll p a y th e C O N S U L T A N T a llo w a b l e c o s ts in a c c o r d a n c e w ith th e t e r m s a n d c o n d i t i o n s a s s e t f o r t h a b o v e . I n a d d it i o n t o t h e p a y m e n ts f o r a ll o w a b l e c o s t s a s h e r e in b e f o r e p r o v i d e d , th e C L I E N T a g r e e s to p a y th e C O N S U L T A N T th e s u m o f T H IR T Y -F O U R T H O U S A N D , T W O H U N D R E D F O R T Y - T W O D O L L A R S ( $ 3 4 ,2 4 2 .0 0 ) , a n d it i s a g r e e d a n d u n d e rs to o d t h a t th i s w i ll c o n s t i tu t e f u ll c o m p e n s a tio n to th e C O N S U L T A N T fo r fix e d fe e c o v e rin g a ll s e rv ic e s a n d w o r k r e q u i r e d b y th e c o n tr a c t ite m s c o v e r e d u n d e r th i s A g r e e m e n t u n le s s s u c h a m o u n t s h a ll b e a m e n d e d in w r i t i n g b y th e C L IE N T .

B . O n c e e a c h m o n th , th e C O N S U L T A N T s h a ll s u b m it to th e C L I E N T a c e rtif ie d in v o ic e fo r a llo w a b le c o s ts in c u rr e d in th e p e r fo r m a n c e o f th is A g r e e m e n t.

* * * A r t ic l e 1 0 . G e n e r a l P r o v is io n s

T h e f o llo w in g g e n e ra l p r o v is io n s a re in c o rp o r a te d h e r e in a n d m a d e a p a r t h e r e o f:

A . C h a n g es . T h e p a rtie s h e re to m a y fr o m tim e to tim e r e q u i r e c h a n g e s in t h e S c o p e o f s e r v i c e s a n d t h e t i m e o f p e r f o r m a n c e a s s e t f o r t h h e re in . S u c h c h a n g e s , in c lu d in g a n y in c r e a s e o r d e c r e a s e in t h e a m o u n t o f th e c o m p e n s a tio n to th e C O N S U L T A N T , w h i c h a re m u tu a ll y a g r e e d u p o n b y a n d b e t w e e n t h e p a rtie s h e r e to , s h a l l b e in c o rp o ra te d a s w ritte n a m e n d m e n t s to th is A g r e e m e n t. A n y c la im b y th e C O N S U L T A N T f o r a n a d ju s t m e n t u n d e r th is c la u s e m u s t b e a s s e rte d w ith in th irty (3 0 ) d a y s fr o m th e d a t e o f th e re c e ip t b y th e C O N S U L T A N T o f t h e n o tific a tio n o f c h a n g e ; p ro v id e d , h o w e v e r, th a t th e C L I E N T m a y , if e q u ity is o b ta in e d , re c e iv e a n d a c t u p o n a n y s u c h c la im a s se rte d a t a n y tim e p rio r to f i n a l p a y m e n t u n d e r th is A g r e e m e n t.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Frederic R. Harris, Inc. v. The Metropolitan Government of Nashville, and Davidson County, (Tenn. Ct. App. 1999).

Frederic R. Harris, Inc. v. The Metropolitan Government of Nashville, and Davidson County (Frederic R. Harris, Inc. v. The Metropolitan Government of Nashville, and Davidson County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.