Frederic Albert Deininger v. Estelle Desiree Deininger

180 F.2d 396, 86 U.S. App. D.C. 414
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedFebruary 6, 1950
Docket10023
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 180 F.2d 396 (Frederic Albert Deininger v. Estelle Desiree Deininger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Frederic Albert Deininger v. Estelle Desiree Deininger, 180 F.2d 396, 86 U.S. App. D.C. 414 (D.C. Cir. 1950).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is a divorce case. The husband appeals from the judgment of the District Court which granted to the wife a limited divorce, alimony and counsel fees. We find ho substantial error in the record.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
180 F.2d 396, 86 U.S. App. D.C. 414, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frederic-albert-deininger-v-estelle-desiree-deininger-cadc-1950.