Fredenburg v. Lyon Lake M. E. Church

37 Mich. 476, 1877 Mich. LEXIS 297
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 25, 1877
StatusPublished
Cited by15 cases

This text of 37 Mich. 476 (Fredenburg v. Lyon Lake M. E. Church) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fredenburg v. Lyon Lake M. E. Church, 37 Mich. 476, 1877 Mich. LEXIS 297 (Mich. 1877).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In the court below the corporate existence of the defendant in error was in dispute, and they sought to establish it by showing that the associates held the ordinary meetings of a religious society, and that they elected officers, among which was Fredenburg as treasurer. This evidence was held to be sufficient; the court regarding Fredenburg as precluded, by accepting the office of treasurer, from disputing the corporate existence. Now had any of the acts of the associates been unmistakably corporate acts, there would be some ground for the ruling of the court below. But such was not the case. Every act done, including the election of officers, was just as consistent with the existence of an unincorporated association as of a corporate body, and was just as proper to be done by the one as the other. Indeed, the evidence in the court below, taken together, tended very strongly to show that no corporation had ever been formed, and that the associates had not seen fit to avail themselves of the authority of the statute for that purpose. Under such circumstances there is no room for the suggestion that any one was estopped from denying the incorporation. Estoppels, never arise from ambiguous facts; they must be established by those which are unequivocal, and not susceptible of two constructions. See Bennett v. Dean, 35 Mich., 306.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commercial Union Insurance v. Liberty Mutual Insurance
357 N.W.2d 861 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1984)
Commercial Union Insurance v. Medical Protective Co.
356 N.W.2d 648 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1984)
Baxter v. Jones
185 F. 900 (E.D. Kentucky, 1910)
Nichols v. Buell
122 N.W. 217 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1909)
Lincoln Butter Co. v. Edwards-Bradford Lumber Co.
107 N.W. 797 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1906)
Byrne v. Werner
69 L.R.A. 900 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1904)
Elgin Nat. Watch Co. v. Loveland
132 F. 41 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Iowa, 1904)
Riverside Land Co. v. Pietsch
77 P. 195 (Washington Supreme Court, 1904)
Leidigh Carriage Co. v. Stengel
95 F. 637 (Sixth Circuit, 1899)
Schloss & Kahn v. Montgomery Trade Co.
87 Ala. 411 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1888)
Kirkpatrick v. U. P. Church
19 N.W. 272 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1884)
Maxwell v. Bay City Bridge Co.
2 N.W. 639 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1879)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
37 Mich. 476, 1877 Mich. LEXIS 297, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fredenburg-v-lyon-lake-m-e-church-mich-1877.