Fredel v. Fredel
175 So. 2d 218, 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 4176
Opinion
The appellant, former husband, presents for review the financial provisions of a decree of divorce. The sole point presented is that the chancellor erred in requiring alimony and child support in the amounts set. The appellant has failed to show an abuse of discretion by the chancellor and the decree is affirmed upon the rule stated in Pross v. Pross, Fla.1954, 72 So.2d 671, 672.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fredel v. Fredel, 175 So. 2d 218, 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 4176 (Fla. Ct. App. 1965).
175 So. 2d 218 (Fredel v. Fredel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Pross v. Pross
72 So. 2d 671 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1954)