Fredel v. Fredel

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Fredel v. Fredel

175 So. 2d 218, 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 4176

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 6, 1965

DocketNo. 64-690

StatusPublished

This text of 175 So. 2d 218 (Fredel v. Fredel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fredel v. Fredel, 175 So. 2d 218, 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 4176 (Fla. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, former husband, presents for review the financial provisions of a decree of divorce. The sole point presented is that the chancellor erred in requiring alimony and child support in the amounts set. The appellant has failed to show an abuse of discretion by the chancellor and the decree is affirmed upon the rule stated in Pross v. Pross, Fla.1954, 72 So.2d 671, 672.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, former husband, presents for review the financial provisions of a decree of divorce. The sole point presented is that the chancellor erred in requiring alimony and child support in the amounts set. The appellant has failed to show an abuse of discretion by the chancellor and the decree is affirmed upon the rule stated in Pross v. Pross, Fla.1954, 72 So.2d 671, 672.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

175 So. 2d 218, 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 4176, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fredel-v-fredel-fladistctapp-1965.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack