Freddy Uceta v. State
This text of Freddy Uceta v. State (Freddy Uceta v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
JUDGMENT RENDERED NOVEMBER 5, 2019
NO. 03-18-00506-CR
Freddy Uceta, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
APPEAL FROM THE 426TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES KELLY AND SMITH AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE
This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction rendered by the trial court. Having reviewed
the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the
trial court’s judgment of conviction. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of
conviction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is
made.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Freddy Uceta v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/freddy-uceta-v-state-texapp-2019.