Freddy Curiel v. Amy Miller
798 F.3d 1209, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 15016, 2015 WL 5023604
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided August 25, 2015·No. 11-56949·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
Judge Pregerson did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Freddy Curiel v. Amy Miller, 798 F.3d 1209, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 15016, 2015 WL 5023604 (9th Cir. 2015).
798 F.3d 1209 (Freddy Curiel v. Amy Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Freddy Curiel v. Amy Miller
830 F.3d 864 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)