Freddie Sanchez Gallow A/K/A Freddie Sanchez Watson v. State

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: October 28, 2010
• Docket: 14-10-00679-CR
• Status: Published

Opinion

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed October 28, 2010.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-10-00679-CR

FREDDIE SANCHEZ GALLOW A/K/A FREDDIE SANCHEZ WATSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 252nd District Court

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 90476

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant entered a plea of guilty to burglary of a habitation.  The trial court deferred adjudicating guilt and placed appellant under community supervision for eight years.  Subsequently, the State moved to adjudicate guilt.  Appellant entered a plea of true to two alleged violations.  The trial court proceeded to adjudicate guilt and on July 7, 2010, sentenced appellant to confinement for fifteen years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice.  Appellant filed a timely notice of appeal.

Appellant=s appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirement of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).

A copy of counsel’s brief was delivered to appellant.  Appellant was advised of the right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response. See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex. (Tex. Crim. App.1991). As of this date, no pro se response has been filed.

We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel=s brief and agree the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find no reversible error in the record. We are not to address the merits of each claim raised in an Anders brief or a pro se response when we have determined there are no arguable grounds for review. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).

Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Seymore, Boyce and Christopher.

Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).