Freddie Lee Walker v. Kathryn Slowik, Hearing Officer, Tex. Dept. Crim. Justice, Parole Division Jesus Santos, Supervising Officer, Tex. Dept. Crim. Justice, Parole Division
This text of Freddie Lee Walker v. Kathryn Slowik, Hearing Officer, Tex. Dept. Crim. Justice, Parole Division Jesus Santos, Supervising Officer, Tex. Dept. Crim. Justice, Parole Division (Freddie Lee Walker v. Kathryn Slowik, Hearing Officer, Tex. Dept. Crim. Justice, Parole Division Jesus Santos, Supervising Officer, Tex. Dept. Crim. Justice, Parole Division) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-19-00029-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
FREDDIE LEE WALKER, Appellant,
v.
KATHRYN SLOWIK, HEARING OFFICER, TEX. DEPT. CRIM. JUSTICE, PAROLE DIVISION; JESUS SANTOS, SUPERVISING OFFICER, TEX. DEPT. CRIM. JUSTICE, PAROLE DIVISION, Appellees.
On appeal from the 73rd District Court of Bexar County, Texas.
ORDER Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Perkes Order Per Curiam
Appellant, Freddy Lee Walker, appeals from a final judgment entered by the trial court on December 17, 2018.1 This cause is before the Court on appellant’s motion for
a free appellate record. Appellant is incarcerated and proceeding pro se. Appellant’s
motion states he needs the record for purposes of preparing his appellate brief and has
“previously been granted in forma pauperis status.”
The clerk’s record reflects appellant filed an affidavit of inability to pay costs on
October 4, 2018, and does not reflect that a contest was filed. Appellant filed an affidavit
of indigency and motion to proceed without payment of fees and costs with his notice of
appeal on December 31, 2018.
Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 145 governs a party’s claim that the party is unable
to afford costs for preparation of the appellate record. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 145. A party
who filed a statement of inability to afford payments of court costs cannot be required to
pay costs except by order of the court. See id. R. 145(a). Costs are defined to include
“fees charged by the clerk or court reporter for preparation of the appellate record.” Id.
R. 145(c). Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 20.1(b)(1) provides that when a party files
a statement of inability to afford payment of court costs in the trial court, the party is not
required to pay costs in the appellate court unless the trial court overruled the party’s
claim of indigence by order under Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 145. See TEX. R. APP.
P. 20.1(b)(1).
Accordingly, having fully examined appellant’s motion and the record before us,
1This case is before the Court on transfer from the Fourth Court of Appeals in San Antonio pursuant to a docket equalization order issued by the Supreme Court of Texas. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 73.001 (West, Westlaw through 2017 1st C.S.).
2 we GRANT appellant’s motion and ORDER a free appellate record be prepared and
made available to appellant on or before April 5, 2019. It is FURTHER ORDERED that
the trial court notify this Court as to the date upon which the appellate record was made
available to appellant.
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed the 20th day of March, 2019.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Freddie Lee Walker v. Kathryn Slowik, Hearing Officer, Tex. Dept. Crim. Justice, Parole Division Jesus Santos, Supervising Officer, Tex. Dept. Crim. Justice, Parole Division, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/freddie-lee-walker-v-kathryn-slowik-hearing-officer-tex-dept-crim-texapp-2019.