Freddie L. Walker v. Stephanie Renee Davila and Vernon Ringer
This text of Freddie L. Walker v. Stephanie Renee Davila and Vernon Ringer (Freddie L. Walker v. Stephanie Renee Davila and Vernon Ringer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
__________________
NO. 09-24-00358-CV __________________
FREDDIE L. WALKER, Appellant
V.
STEPHANIE RENEE DAVILA AND VERNON RINGER, Appellees
__________________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the 260th District Court Orange County, Texas Trial Cause No. D230267-C __________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On October 25, 2024, Freddie L. Walker filed a notice of appeal from
unspecified “denial interlocutory orders in the above cause.” We questioned our
jurisdiction and asked the parties to identify the statute or rule authorizing an appeal
at this time. In a response, Walker argued he should be allowed to pursue a
permissive appeal, but he did not claim that the trial court had permitted an appeal
from an interlocutory order that would not otherwise be appealable. See generally
Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014(d).
1 A supplemental clerk’s record filed on November 19, 2024, contains the trial
court’s November 18, 2024, order granting Walker’s Voluntary Motion to Dismiss
Without Prejudice and dismissing the cause without prejudice. Upon receiving the
supplemental clerk’s record, the Clerk of the Court notified the parties that unless
the Court received a valid objection the appeal would proceed as a regular appeal.
Walker filed his brief on December 16, 2024.
On December 19, 2024, Stephanie Renee Davila filed a motion to dismiss the
appeal. Davila contends there is no pending controversy between the parties and the
appeal is moot. Walker did not respond to the motion, nor does he argue in his brief
that the appeal is not moot. Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal.
See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).
APPEAL DISMISSED.
PER CURIAM
Submitted on January 22, 2025 Opinion Delivered January 23, 2025
Before Golemon, C.J., Wright and Chambers, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Freddie L. Walker v. Stephanie Renee Davila and Vernon Ringer, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/freddie-l-walker-v-stephanie-renee-davila-and-vernon-ringer-texapp-2025.