Freddie James Foreman v. State

Opinion

iaH*H>o22&-cef

Vl&CcM ^oZ015 IRECD IN COURT OF APPEALSf 12th Court of Appeals District

IA1*..Cou<r+ of Appeals MAR - 9 2014 jSm\

~~ TYLER TEXAS CATHY S. LUSK, CLERK

R£: S+A-iroS Of a^eal/Caoiso fJ\*nia€y IftflflrHM

Dca.^. .cU^Kj

Of .CordrmllsScX <Suk>2rVA<\)Co.-TPws jfaoK 0&c£ flniiug W^ SLO IH,. X uJA5 qii/e<n A<0 ft~VVof t&\\ ^Bsj "lEjt. dodiAr "To

_X 5-V^-todl X^ m^ tsifcsc To W\&. QjtotCfdi ~TM-VU-CajLcL

iofOvf^x'lkc Coux-t- oflKis rvvMte>LV.-£kL_^il2_i2./J^Qi^-i .filed a._ma4riov\ cu\-Ma I>\^Widr Ct&fK rv>o4ion F&r A J&^Cftkstf: A^psllA-^ .Coo-ASeL X Vfcfo/rvt- H^iftM F/Qm~ffiE

^The S+A+U5 OP My &pp.£iAi- A^d VWe hee_-AAppended Atfoti \dt

JVKyhort toAS Uo/wdl AmznckzA iMorha^ "To Smppr^sre.. "The (jOOf-r Ooni€<Ji TPuS iTYlotion * The A.pp£(U*\j4: muSJr... feWzs "IWe Coi^tJJ^oadbds gsco^dt Au$ H3ao/H "foe

A^caL~TRaa»K you*

fColl ^m<l30 l4vnni<SV/i U^jT^><-A5 T734 3