Fred Young, III v. Hubert Stone
This text of 862 F.2d 871 (Fred Young, III v. Hubert Stone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
862 F.2d 871
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Fred YOUNG, III, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Hubert STONE, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 88-7230.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 26, 1988.
Decided: Nov. 18, 1988.
Fred Young, III, appellant pro se.
William McBlief (Womble, Carlyle, Sandridge & Rice), for appellee.
Before DONALD RUSSELL, K.K. HALL and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Fred Young, III, appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Young v. Stone, C/A No. 87-626-CRT (E.D.N.C. Aug. 8, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
862 F.2d 871, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 15896, 1988 WL 124971, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fred-young-iii-v-hubert-stone-ca4-1988.