Fred W. Staudt v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

216 F.2d 610, 46 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 1051, 1954 U.S. App. LEXIS 4348
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedNovember 8, 1954
Docket6875
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 216 F.2d 610 (Fred W. Staudt v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fred W. Staudt v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 216 F.2d 610, 46 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 1051, 1954 U.S. App. LEXIS 4348 (4th Cir. 1954).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is a petition to review a decision of the Tax Court which affirmed deficiency assessments of income taxes against taxpayer for the years 1942 and 1943 and the assessment of a fraud penalty for the year 1942. We agree with the Tax Court that taxpayer has not sustained the burden of overcoming the presumption of correctness which attaches to the Commissioner’s assessment of the deficiencies here questioned, and we agree, too, that the Commissioner has sufficiently established, not only that there was an understatement of income by taxpayer in his return for the year 1942, but also that this was intentional and fraudulent. Taxpayer, in defense, offers evidence as to the condition of his *611 health and its effect upon his mental condition at the time of the filing of the return; but we are not convinced by it that taxpayer was not aware of what he was doing or of the fraud that it involved. The fact that he admits the filing of returns which grossly understated income for each of the eight years preceding 1942, when there was no question as to his mental condition, and that fraud penalties have been assessed for each of these years, goes far toward negativing any contention that he was unaware of the fraud that he was committing in connection with the filing of the 1942 return. His conduct there merely followed the pattern that he had established in preceding years. At all events, it is clear that we would not be justified in setting aside as clearly wrong the finding of the Tax Court with respect to this matter.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cruea v. Commissioner
1985 T.C. Memo. 553 (U.S. Tax Court, 1985)
Klein v. Commissioner
1984 T.C. Memo. 392 (U.S. Tax Court, 1984)
Farber v. Commissioner
43 T.C. 407 (U.S. Tax Court, 1965)
Burnett v. Commissioner
1964 T.C. Memo. 314 (U.S. Tax Court, 1964)
Estate of Maceo v. Comm'r
1964 T.C. Memo. 46 (U.S. Tax Court, 1964)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
216 F.2d 610, 46 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 1051, 1954 U.S. App. LEXIS 4348, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fred-w-staudt-v-commissioner-of-internal-revenue-ca4-1954.