Fred Vega, III v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 8, 2018
Docket03-17-00876-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Fred Vega, III v. State (Fred Vega, III v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fred Vega, III v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

ACCEPTED 03-17-00876-CR 21666835 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 1/8/2018 11:25 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE CLERK NO. 03-17-00876-CR

FRED VEGA, III § IN THE THIRD FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS § AUSTIN, TEXAS vs. § COURT OF APPEALS 1/8/2018 11:25:16 AM § JEFFREY D. KYLE THE STATE OF TEXAS § OF TEXAS Clerk

MOTION TO DISMISS

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF SAID COURT:

Now comes the State of Texas, Appellee in the above-styled and -numbered

cause, and moves this Honorable Court to dismiss the Appeal related to FRED

VEGA III’s trial court cause number CR2017-162, and for good cause would show

the following:

I.

Appellant pled guilty to Possession with Intent to Deliver, Tampering with

Physical Evidence and Evading Arrest offenses committed on or about August 6,

2016. Judgments at 1, attached. Appellant entered into a signed plea agreement

with the State in which he waived his right to appeal from the judgment and

sentence. Plea Bargain Agreements at 3, attached. The Court followed the plea

agreements, sentencing Appellant to 30- and 20-year sentences years confinement

in TDCJ on November 20, 2017. In the trial court’s certification, signed by

Appellant and his counsel, the trial court noted the Appellant had no right of

appeal. Trial Court’s Certification at 1, attached.

1 II.

Appellant filed his untimely notice of appeal on December 29, 2017. As

agreed to in the plea and stated in the Trial Court’s Certification of Defendant’s

Right of Appeal, Appellant has waived the right of appeal and has no right of

appeal in this case. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d); see also Blanco v. State, 18

S.W.3d 218, 220 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000) (finding no valid or compelling reason

defendant should not be held to his plea bargain waiver of his right to appeal). The

appeal should therefore be dismissed.

III.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, the State’s counsel

respectfully prays that this Honorable Court dismiss FRED VEGA, III’s appeal.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Joshua D. Presley Joshua D. Presley, SBN: 24088254 preslj@co.comal.tx.us Comal Criminal District Attorney’s Office 150 N. Seguin Avenue, Suite 307 New Braunfels, Texas 78130 Ph: (830) 221-1300 / Fax: (830) 608-2008

2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Joshua D. Presley, Assistant District Attorney for the State of Texas,

Appellee, hereby certify that a true and correct copy of this Motion to Dismiss,

along with the following Appendix, has been sent to Appellant FRED VEGA III’s

attorney of record in this matter:

C. Wayne Huff cwhuff@aol.com P.O. Box 2334 Boerne, TX 78006

through efile.txcourts.gov electronic service to the foregoing email address on this,

the 8th day of January, 2018.

/s/ Joshua D. Presley Joshua D. Presley

APPENDIX

“A” – Certified Judgments of Conviction

“B” – Certified Plea Bargain Agreements

“C” – Certified Certificate of Right to Appeal

3 CASE No. CR2017-162 COUNT I INCIDENT No.fi'RN: 9213170882 TRS: A001

THE STATE OF TEXAS § IN THE DISTRICT COURTT § v. § 207Ttt JUDICIAL DISTRICT § FRED VEGA, III § COMAL COUNTY, TEXAS § STATE ID No.: TX-05691865 §

JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION BY COURT-WAIVER OF JURY TRIAL Dote Judgment Judge Presiding: HoN. BRUCE BOYER Entered: NOVEMBER 20, 2017 AUorney for Attorney for State: SAMMY MCCRARY Defendant: ANTHONY CANTRELL Offense for which Defendant Convicted: POSSESSION WITH INTENT TO DELIVER A CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE PG 1 > 1 GRAM< 4 GRAMS Chnrging InstntOIPnt: Statute for Offense: §481.112(c) HEALTH & SAFETY CODE I INDICTMENT §12.42(d) PENAL CODE Date of Offen ~~e: AUGUST 6 2016 Degree o(Offon...e; Plt>n to Offense: Findings on Deadly Weapon: SECOND DEGREE FELONY ENHANCED TO HABITUAL OFFENDER (30 YEARS TO 99 GUILTY N/A YEARS OR LIFE) Terms of Plea Bamain: THIRTY (30) YEARS CONFINEMENT IN THE INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION OF THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND $180.00 RESTITUTION Plcn to 1" Enhancement Paragraph: TRUE Findings on 1"' Enhancement Paragraph: TRUE Plea hl 2m1 Enhancement Paragraph: TRUE Findings on 2"d Enhancement Paragraph: TRUE Date Sentence Imposed: NOVEMBER 20, 2017 Date Sentence to Commence: NOVEMBER 20, 2017 Punishment and Place of Confinement: THIRTY (30) \'EARS CONFINEMENT IN THE INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, TDCJ THIS SENTENCI!: SHALL IWN CONCURRENTLY. CJSENTENCE OF CONFINEMENT SUSPENDED, DEFENDANT Pl..i\CED ON COMMUNITY SUPERVISION FOR N/A. Qout1 Cmts: Restitution: Restitution Payable to: 0 VICTIM (see below) l8J AGENCY/AGENT (see below) TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC $0.00 $400.00 $180.00 SAFETY RES1'1TUTION ACCOUNTING 1'.0 . UOX 4087 AUSTIN. TEXAS 78773-0130 AUS·l GOB·l •1770 Sex Offender Registration Requirements do not apply to the Defendant. Tl~:>.. CouE CRIM. PROC. chapter 62 The age of the victim at the time of the offense was N/A. If Pcfl!ndnnt j!l t.o f!Crvc HCDtcncc jo TDCJ. enter incarccro! ion orriod~ in cbronolo!tirnl order. Timo FROM 08106116 TO 08113116 03/07/17 TO 11120/17 Credited: This <:stllstJ was called for trial in COI\IAL County, Texas. The Stnte appeared by her District Attorney.

Counsel/Waiver of Counsel (select one)

~ Defendant appeared in person with Counsl'L

D Defendant knowingly, intelligently, nnd voluntarily waived the right to rnpmseut.ation by counsel in writing in open court. Both parties announced rcndy for trial. Defendant waived the right of trial by jury and entered the plea indicated above. The Court then admonished Defendnnt as required by lnw. ft nppent-cd to the Court that Defendant was mentally competent to stand t.rinl, made the plea freely and voluntarily, and was aware of the consequences of this plea. The Court received the plea and entered it of record. Having hcnrd the evidence submitted, the Court found Defendant guilty of the offense indicated above. In the presence of Defendant, the Court pronounced sentence agninst Defendant. The Court FINDS Defendant cmnmittetl the above offense and ORDERS, ADJUDGES AND DECREES that Defendant is GUILTY of the above offense. The Com't FINDS the Presentence Investigation, if so ordered, was done according to the Rpplicnble p1·ovisions of TEX. CoDE ClttM. Ptmc. art. 42.12 § 9. The Court OJtoERS Defendnnt punished us indicated abo\'O. The Court ORDERS Defendant to pay all fines, court costs, and restitution as indicated above.

Punishment Ootlons (select one)

(8] Confinement in Stute Jail or Institutional Division. The Court ORDERS the authorized agent of the State of Texas or the SheriiT of this County to take, safely convey, and deliver Defendnnt to the Director, INSTITUTIONAL DIV1SION, TDCJ. The Court ORDERS Defendant to be confined for the period and in the manner indicated above. The Court ORDERS Defendnnt remanded to the custody of the Sheriff of this county until the SheriiT can obey the directions of this sentence. The Court ORDERS thnt upon release from confinement, Defendant proceed immediately to the pnrnle and/ or probation department. Once there, the Court ORDERS Defendant to pny, ot· make arrangements to pay. any a-emaining unpaid fines, court costs, and restitution as ordered by the Court above.

0 County Jail-Confinement I Confinement in Lieu of Payment. The Court ORDERS Defendant immediately committed to the custody of the Sheriff of Comnl County, Texas on the date the sentence is to commence. Defendant shall be confined in tho Comnl County Jail for the period indicated above. The Court ORDERS that upon release from confinement. Defendant shall proceed immediately to the N/A. Once there, the Court ORDERS Defendant to pay, or make arrangements to pay, any remaining unpaid finos, court costs, and restitution ns ordered by the Court above.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Blanco v. State
18 S.W.3d 218 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Fred Vega, III v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fred-vega-iii-v-state-texapp-2018.