Fred Robert White v. Leslie M. Leader John S. Denholm Adlai T. White Leslie S. Goldstein Mary W. Conaway Michael E. Lee

Fourth Circuit

Fred Robert White v. Leslie M. Leader John S. Denholm Adlai T. White Leslie S. Goldstein Mary W. Conaway Michael E. Lee

56 F.3d 63, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 19162, 1995 WL 318479

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMay 25, 1995

Docket94-7287

StatusPublished

This text of 56 F.3d 63 (Fred Robert White v. Leslie M. Leader John S. Denholm Adlai T. White Leslie S. Goldstein Mary W. Conaway Michael E. Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fred Robert White v. Leslie M. Leader John S. Denholm Adlai T. White Leslie S. Goldstein Mary W. Conaway Michael E. Lee, 56 F.3d 63, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 19162, 1995 WL 318479 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

56 F.3d 63
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Fred Robert WHITE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Leslie M. LEADER; John S. Denholm; Adlai T. White; Leslie
S. Goldstein; Mary W. Conaway; Michael E. Lee,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 94-7287.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 20, 1995.
Decided May 25, 1995.

Fred Robert White, appellant pro se.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) Complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915(d) (1988). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. White v. Leader, No. CA-94-2901 (D. Md. Oct. 31, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

56 F.3d 63
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Fred Robert WHITE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Leslie M. LEADER; John S. Denholm; Adlai T. White; Leslie
S. Goldstein; Mary W. Conaway; Michael E. Lee,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 94-7287.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 20, 1995.
Decided May 25, 1995.

Fred Robert White, appellant pro se.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) Complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915(d) (1988). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. White v. Leader, No. CA-94-2901 (D. Md. Oct. 31, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

56 F.3d 63, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 19162, 1995 WL 318479, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fred-robert-white-v-leslie-m-leader-john-s-denholm-ca4-1995.