Fred R. Jones Co. v. Fath

101 Ohio St. (N.S.) 534
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 6, 1920·No. No. 16224·Published

Opinion

The application of defendants in error for a rehearing herein having heretofore been allowed, June 24, 1920, this cause came on again to be heard upon the transcript of the record of the court of appeals of Cuyahoga county and was argued by counsel. On consideration whereof, it is ordered that the former judgment, entered herein on January 27, 1920 [ante, 47], and recorded in Journal [535]*535No. 28, page 372, be, and the same hereby is, adhered to.

Former judgment adhered to.

Nichols, C. J., Matthias, Johnson, Wanamaker, Robinson and Avery, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fred R. Jones Co. v. Fath, 101 Ohio St. (N.S.) 534 (Ohio 1920).

101 Ohio St. (N.S.) 534 (Fred R. Jones Co. v. Fath) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.