Fred N. Boynton, Trustee in Bankruptcy, Cross-Appellant v. Stavros T. Vradelis, AKA Steve T. Vradelis, AKA S. T. Vradelis, Cross

Sixth Circuit

Fred N. Boynton, Trustee in Bankruptcy, Cross-Appellant v. Stavros T. Vradelis, AKA Steve T. Vradelis, AKA S. T. Vradelis, Cross

240 F.2d 846

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 8, 1957

Docket13067

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 240 F.2d 846 (Fred N. Boynton, Trustee in Bankruptcy, Cross-Appellant v. Stavros T. Vradelis, AKA Steve T. Vradelis, AKA S. T. Vradelis, Cross) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fred N. Boynton, Trustee in Bankruptcy, Cross-Appellant v. Stavros T. Vradelis, AKA Steve T. Vradelis, AKA S. T. Vradelis, Cross, 240 F.2d 846 (6th Cir. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

It appearing to the Court that the foregoing appeal instituted by Fred N. Boynton, Cross-Appellant, against Stavros T. Vradelis, Cross-Appellee, has been mutually settled to the satisfaction of both parties; and it further appearing to the Court that the bankruptcy proceeding originating in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, being Case #19385 of the docket of said Court, in Bankruptcy, and out of which this Appeal has originated has beén settled to the mutual satisfaction of the parties thereto and the proceedings dismissed; and the Court-being advised in the premises.

Now, therefore, it is ordered by the court that, the above' captioned appeal •be, and the same is hereby dismissed with prejudice to the commencement of another appeal upon the same cause.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

It appearing to the Court that the foregoing appeal instituted by Fred N. Boynton, Cross-Appellant, against Stavros T. Vradelis, Cross-Appellee, has been mutually settled to the satisfaction of both parties; and it further appearing to the Court that the bankruptcy proceeding originating in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, being Case #19385 of the docket of said Court, in Bankruptcy, and out of which this Appeal has originated has beén settled to the mutual satisfaction of the parties thereto and the proceedings dismissed; and the Court-being advised in the premises.

Now, therefore, it is ordered by the court that, the above' captioned appeal •be, and the same is hereby dismissed with prejudice to the commencement of another appeal upon the same cause.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

240 F.2d 846, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fred-n-boynton-trustee-in-bankruptcy-cross-appellant-v-stavros-t-ca6-1957.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack