Fred. Miller Brewing Co. v. Quirk

52 N.W. 93, 82 Wis. 197, 1892 Wisc. LEXIS 131
Wisconsin Supreme Court·Decided May 3, 1892·Published

Opinion

WiNSlow, J.

The admission of service of notice of trial for the third term was not a waiver of the right to move to dismiss. Holt v. Coleman, 61 Wis. 422. Was good cause shown for continuing the case? We think not. The affidavits do not show that the respondent’s attorney gave the appellant any encouragement to believe that they would discontinue the case. The superior court held, as the fact seems to be, that‘the appellant misléd his own attorney, and that the failure to notice the case was the direct result of his own neglect. Under these circumstances, no case was presented justifying the court in continuing the cause.

By the Court.— Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fred. Miller Brewing Co. v. Quirk, 52 N.W. 93, 82 Wis. 197, 1892 Wisc. LEXIS 131 (Wis. 1892).

52 N.W. 93 (Fred. Miller Brewing Co. v. Quirk) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Holt v. Coleman
21 N.W. 297 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1884)