Fred. Miller Brewing Co. v. Quirk
This text of 52 N.W. 93 (Fred. Miller Brewing Co. v. Quirk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The admission of service of notice of trial for the third term was not a waiver of the right to move to dismiss. Holt v. Coleman, 61 Wis. 422. Was good cause shown for continuing the case? We think not. The affidavits do not show that the respondent’s attorney gave the appellant any encouragement to believe that they would discontinue the case. The superior court held, as the fact seems to be, that‘the appellant misléd his own attorney, and that the failure to notice the case was the direct result of his own neglect. Under these circumstances, no case was presented justifying the court in continuing the cause.
By the Court.— Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
52 N.W. 93, 82 Wis. 197, 1892 Wisc. LEXIS 131, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fred-miller-brewing-co-v-quirk-wis-1892.